From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion

John Hampson might not be famous, but his art is unique and interesting and as such deserves an article in Wikipedia. A respected museum in Vermont exhibits his work, each one taking years to make. The sources are perfectly legitimate and are in no way promotional, other than describing and explaining the artist's story in order to motivate interest. I think if you read his story and look at the sources you will be persuaded that Hampson deserves a Wikipedia page. SundaeSolace ( talk) 13:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Only if the references prove it. Drmies ( talk) 02:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
They do. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 12:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion

John Hampson might not be famous, but his art is unique and interesting and as such deserves an article in Wikipedia. A respected museum in Vermont exhibits his work, each one taking years to make. The sources are perfectly legitimate and are in no way promotional, other than describing and explaining the artist's story in order to motivate interest. I think if you read his story and look at the sources you will be persuaded that Hampson deserves a Wikipedia page. SundaeSolace ( talk) 13:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Only if the references prove it. Drmies ( talk) 02:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
They do. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 12:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook