![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I plan to delete the following: "Gower takes the side of the aristocracy, and appears to have admired the techniques Richard II used to suppress the revolt." I am unable to find any admiration for Richard II's techniques in VC Book one. Cap. XVII suggests Richard failed to suppress the revolt. Credit is given to William Walworth in CAP XIX. Rdmoore6 ( talk) 19:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know how to fix it, but there is a spelling error up at the very top of the entry, the very first paragraph. The spelling is, as correct later in the article, "Mirour."
Hello,
I am proofing the works of John Gower with Distributed_Proofreaders, aiming to do an ebook available on Project Gutenberg. The precise book is "Complete Works of John Gower", with Macaulay as an editor.
in this book, one of the text is called "Mirour de l'omme or Speculum Hominis". It is slighty different that what is written on the article, which is "Mirrour de l'homme, or Speculum Meditantis". I am by no mean an expert so I can't judge, but I would like to know who is right.
Koxinga 19:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Can anyone confirm this is the same John Gower who is dramatised by Shakespeare in Pericles, Prince of Tyre? AndyJones 19:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I have suppressed (via hidden text) the remarks on Trentham manuscript for two reasons:
The Sobecki article is available online on the journal home page, and the article affects Gower's political views. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Farabay (
talk •
contribs) 18:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I have added a section on the Trentham manuscript, given its significance for Gower's politics and his handwriting.
Farabay (
talk) 18:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I am unable to find any citation to support Gower as "ideal English soldier" in Henry V. Perusal of Shakespeare's play does not support this. Act III Scene VI a character is addressed as "Captain Gower". There is little in John Gower's biography which would suggest he was a soldier.
Most occurrences of this phrase in Google are derived from the Wikipedia article. Principal exception is Gen Robert E Lee. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/2669/McDonnell%20Dissertation%201.pdf.txt?sequence=3&isAllowed=y — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdmoore6 ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I plan to delete the following: "Gower takes the side of the aristocracy, and appears to have admired the techniques Richard II used to suppress the revolt." I am unable to find any admiration for Richard II's techniques in VC Book one. Cap. XVII suggests Richard failed to suppress the revolt. Credit is given to William Walworth in CAP XIX. Rdmoore6 ( talk) 19:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know how to fix it, but there is a spelling error up at the very top of the entry, the very first paragraph. The spelling is, as correct later in the article, "Mirour."
Hello,
I am proofing the works of John Gower with Distributed_Proofreaders, aiming to do an ebook available on Project Gutenberg. The precise book is "Complete Works of John Gower", with Macaulay as an editor.
in this book, one of the text is called "Mirour de l'omme or Speculum Hominis". It is slighty different that what is written on the article, which is "Mirrour de l'homme, or Speculum Meditantis". I am by no mean an expert so I can't judge, but I would like to know who is right.
Koxinga 19:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Can anyone confirm this is the same John Gower who is dramatised by Shakespeare in Pericles, Prince of Tyre? AndyJones 19:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I have suppressed (via hidden text) the remarks on Trentham manuscript for two reasons:
The Sobecki article is available online on the journal home page, and the article affects Gower's political views. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Farabay (
talk •
contribs) 18:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I have added a section on the Trentham manuscript, given its significance for Gower's politics and his handwriting.
Farabay (
talk) 18:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I am unable to find any citation to support Gower as "ideal English soldier" in Henry V. Perusal of Shakespeare's play does not support this. Act III Scene VI a character is addressed as "Captain Gower". There is little in John Gower's biography which would suggest he was a soldier.
Most occurrences of this phrase in Google are derived from the Wikipedia article. Principal exception is Gen Robert E Lee. https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/2669/McDonnell%20Dissertation%201.pdf.txt?sequence=3&isAllowed=y — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdmoore6 ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)