This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can't find references I think it is bobbin not bobbing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.163.48 ( talk) 19:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
-- 2602:306:8382:9EA0:21E:C2FF:FEA6:1579 ( talk) 22:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)== John Campbell ==
Mar's opponent at Sheriffmuir was John Campbell, the second Duke of Argyll, not his brother, Archbald. Rcpaterson 02:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
22nd Earl? I don't think so. The thing is, the accepted numbering of a peerage is taken from the creation which the current peer holds. Where the title had been forfeited and re-issued to others does not count. It is from the first holder of the latest creation that you commence the count. David Lauder 20:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
is bobbin also robert de lasalle.
The changes to the lead were made by an anon IP in Dec 09 to agree with the last named, but the current wording is clearly ridiculous - have amended it to previous version. Ben Mac Dui 18:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Following the discussion here, I've moved this page so that the subject is disambiguated by date. This is far less confusing than by succession number. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can't find references I think it is bobbin not bobbing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.163.48 ( talk) 19:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
-- 2602:306:8382:9EA0:21E:C2FF:FEA6:1579 ( talk) 22:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)== John Campbell ==
Mar's opponent at Sheriffmuir was John Campbell, the second Duke of Argyll, not his brother, Archbald. Rcpaterson 02:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
22nd Earl? I don't think so. The thing is, the accepted numbering of a peerage is taken from the creation which the current peer holds. Where the title had been forfeited and re-issued to others does not count. It is from the first holder of the latest creation that you commence the count. David Lauder 20:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
is bobbin also robert de lasalle.
The changes to the lead were made by an anon IP in Dec 09 to agree with the last named, but the current wording is clearly ridiculous - have amended it to previous version. Ben Mac Dui 18:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Following the discussion here, I've moved this page so that the subject is disambiguated by date. This is far less confusing than by succession number. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)