![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | John Endecott has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sarnold17 ( talk) 00:58, 9 February 2011 {UTC)
I am making my first Good Article Review. For this reason, I would like to have others join in the review.
I have read over the good article criteria many times, and find that this article meets all of those criteria. I have looked at the documentation for each image, and I have checked all of the wikilinks (that took several hours). I do not understand the criterion for multiple footnotes being in order; in what order should they be? My overall impression is that, with a few minor edits, this article is ready for Good Article status.
I have made numerous small edits, and one rather large edit regarding the wives of John Endecott. As originally written, the article presented Endecott as having two wives, and then allowed for the possibility that he may have had three. From my understanding, using Anderson, Sanborn & Sanborn's Great Migration Begins I think the case for his having had more than two wives is stronger than his having had just two. I therefore attempted to reword the section to at least give equal weight to the two theories of two wives vs three.
Having printed out the article and completed several readings, I have the following comments:
While I've noted a few areas where I had difficulty with the article, overall I find this to be a very well written piece which readily meets the wikipedia criteria for a Good Article. I am delighted to see some excellent works such as this concerning colonial American figures. Sarnold17 ( talk) 00:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Just to close out the review, I would like to summarize the GA criteria in regards to this article:
PASS
I will update the status of the article. Sarnold17 ( talk) 23:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Endecott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Endecott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Currently there is a footnote that states:
This is unclear and does not follow the MOS See MOS:OSNS:
The footnote needs to say
Are there any dates in this article that do not meet this MOS standard as at the moment ? -- PBS ( talk) 11:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
is his name indicott? 185.130.156.202 ( talk) 11:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | John Endecott has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sarnold17 ( talk) 00:58, 9 February 2011 {UTC)
I am making my first Good Article Review. For this reason, I would like to have others join in the review.
I have read over the good article criteria many times, and find that this article meets all of those criteria. I have looked at the documentation for each image, and I have checked all of the wikilinks (that took several hours). I do not understand the criterion for multiple footnotes being in order; in what order should they be? My overall impression is that, with a few minor edits, this article is ready for Good Article status.
I have made numerous small edits, and one rather large edit regarding the wives of John Endecott. As originally written, the article presented Endecott as having two wives, and then allowed for the possibility that he may have had three. From my understanding, using Anderson, Sanborn & Sanborn's Great Migration Begins I think the case for his having had more than two wives is stronger than his having had just two. I therefore attempted to reword the section to at least give equal weight to the two theories of two wives vs three.
Having printed out the article and completed several readings, I have the following comments:
While I've noted a few areas where I had difficulty with the article, overall I find this to be a very well written piece which readily meets the wikipedia criteria for a Good Article. I am delighted to see some excellent works such as this concerning colonial American figures. Sarnold17 ( talk) 00:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Just to close out the review, I would like to summarize the GA criteria in regards to this article:
PASS
I will update the status of the article. Sarnold17 ( talk) 23:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Endecott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Endecott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Currently there is a footnote that states:
This is unclear and does not follow the MOS See MOS:OSNS:
The footnote needs to say
Are there any dates in this article that do not meet this MOS standard as at the moment ? -- PBS ( talk) 11:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
is his name indicott? 185.130.156.202 ( talk) 11:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)