John Demers has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 6, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am going to make a move to change a lot of the statements regarding "involvement" here. The only reason would be because the current statements are kind of misleading, seeing as every source we have sighted, notes possible knowledge, and our article is currently stating he oversaw things from before his confirmation. Before more edits should be made, a discussion should be had, and this should be put under watch as more of the facts reveal themselves. Willthehelpfuleditor ( talk) 02:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
a discussion should be hadPlease proceed with some specifics. soibangla ( talk) 02:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: GuardianH ( talk · contribs) 08:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: GMH Melbourne ( talk · contribs) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am
GMH Melbourne. I will start reviewing this article shortly. Do not hesitate to let me know of any questions and comments you may have. —
GMH Melbourne (
talk) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1. Well written?: ( See below)
2. Verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Neutral point of view?:
5. Stable?:
6. Images?:
when acting attorney general Jeffrey A. Rosen resisted.— be more specific about what Rosen resisted. I don't have access to the source, but perhaps say, "Rosen advised/urged Demers to stay on." GMH Melbourne ( talk) 04:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
John Demers has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 6, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am going to make a move to change a lot of the statements regarding "involvement" here. The only reason would be because the current statements are kind of misleading, seeing as every source we have sighted, notes possible knowledge, and our article is currently stating he oversaw things from before his confirmation. Before more edits should be made, a discussion should be had, and this should be put under watch as more of the facts reveal themselves. Willthehelpfuleditor ( talk) 02:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
a discussion should be hadPlease proceed with some specifics. soibangla ( talk) 02:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: GuardianH ( talk · contribs) 08:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: GMH Melbourne ( talk · contribs) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am
GMH Melbourne. I will start reviewing this article shortly. Do not hesitate to let me know of any questions and comments you may have. —
GMH Melbourne (
talk) 09:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1. Well written?: ( See below)
2. Verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Neutral point of view?:
5. Stable?:
6. Images?:
when acting attorney general Jeffrey A. Rosen resisted.— be more specific about what Rosen resisted. I don't have access to the source, but perhaps say, "Rosen advised/urged Demers to stay on." GMH Melbourne ( talk) 04:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)