![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Concerning the recent removal of Category:American Freemasons (and the revert of that removal). Please read: WP:Categorization of people#General considerations, which states:
If Covell's membership in the Freemason makes him notable, then the article should be able to go much more into more detail as to why and how he is notable for being a Freemason... and there should be reliable sources to support such detail. One sentence from an obituary that simply states, "He was a Mason of high standing - the Grand Lodge on High will welcome him", is hardly enough to show someone was notable for being a Freemason. Blueboar ( talk) 14:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Concerning the recent removal of Category:American Freemasons (and the revert of that removal). Please read: WP:Categorization of people#General considerations, which states:
If Covell's membership in the Freemason makes him notable, then the article should be able to go much more into more detail as to why and how he is notable for being a Freemason... and there should be reliable sources to support such detail. One sentence from an obituary that simply states, "He was a Mason of high standing - the Grand Lodge on High will welcome him", is hardly enough to show someone was notable for being a Freemason. Blueboar ( talk) 14:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)