From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality

What is the

I don't know, but why does he want to do this because it affects the neutrality of the article? Sounds more like poor grammar. -- 24.124.87.54 22:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Problems with Fradin source

Upon review of this source it does not appear to be reliable. It is written in a fictional, mythological format (would be appropriate as a children's book) and does not contain citations or sources of any kind. Claims based on it have been removed. Any disagreement please post and explain below. Psmith85 ( talk) 23:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Yes, it's a book for young readers and should be replaced by a better source. But it was reviewed positively in Publishers Weekly and The New York Times Book Review, both of which commented on its historical accuracy. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 03:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality

What is the

I don't know, but why does he want to do this because it affects the neutrality of the article? Sounds more like poor grammar. -- 24.124.87.54 22:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Problems with Fradin source

Upon review of this source it does not appear to be reliable. It is written in a fictional, mythological format (would be appropriate as a children's book) and does not contain citations or sources of any kind. Claims based on it have been removed. Any disagreement please post and explain below. Psmith85 ( talk) 23:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Yes, it's a book for young readers and should be replaced by a better source. But it was reviewed positively in Publishers Weekly and The New York Times Book Review, both of which commented on its historical accuracy. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 03:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook