This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
John Abt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original research argument relevant to this page is discussed on the Talk:Harry_Magdoff/Archive1#Venona page.
DJ Silverfish 03:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
As someone who just stumbled across this page, it reads like a lot of hearsay and innuendo. If BLP applied, a lot of this stuff wouldn't make it, not by a country mile. 98.216.11.183 ( talk) 03:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
This article recites bare allegations against John Abt and the "Ware Group" as being historical facts. From what I've seen, no one has ever produced credible evidence of these allegations against Mr. Abt, and from evaluating this article, I see no revelation of hitherto undiscovered proof that justifies posting such accusations to an internet encyclopedia as if they were true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben.Remahl ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Abt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Why do Wikipedians bother to mark a page with this banner?
This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page.
If you have bothered to make the comment, you have already bothered to make the assessment, which means you know what it lacks, so why not bother just a tad further and fix it?
Why do so many Wikipedians seem to revel in criticizing without doing better themselves?
I am removing the banner -- and inviting this critic and all others to stop wasting time on banners and start making constructive changes Aboudaqn ( talk) 11:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
John Abt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The original research argument relevant to this page is discussed on the Talk:Harry_Magdoff/Archive1#Venona page.
DJ Silverfish 03:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
As someone who just stumbled across this page, it reads like a lot of hearsay and innuendo. If BLP applied, a lot of this stuff wouldn't make it, not by a country mile. 98.216.11.183 ( talk) 03:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
This article recites bare allegations against John Abt and the "Ware Group" as being historical facts. From what I've seen, no one has ever produced credible evidence of these allegations against Mr. Abt, and from evaluating this article, I see no revelation of hitherto undiscovered proof that justifies posting such accusations to an internet encyclopedia as if they were true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben.Remahl ( talk • contribs) 01:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Abt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Why do Wikipedians bother to mark a page with this banner?
This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page.
If you have bothered to make the comment, you have already bothered to make the assessment, which means you know what it lacks, so why not bother just a tad further and fix it?
Why do so many Wikipedians seem to revel in criticizing without doing better themselves?
I am removing the banner -- and inviting this critic and all others to stop wasting time on banners and start making constructive changes Aboudaqn ( talk) 11:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)