![]() | Joe Darling has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on November 21, 2021. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good luck with the FT :) dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. I have made it through the first half of the article so far, but I might not be able to finish the review until later today. To speed up the process, I like to post my concerns as I go so that the editor doesn't have to wait until the review is complete to start working on the article. With that said, my concerns so far are as follows:
That's all so far. I will do what I can to complete the review today. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 19:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I have now completed the review. The article is very close to passing.
Is it reasonably well written?
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
Is it broad in its coverage?
Is it neutral?
Is it stable?
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Overall:
I would like to see the list of my four concerns above addressed. Aside from that, I think this is ready to be passed as a Good Article. I did feel, however, that there were times when the article could be focused better. In the "Captaincy" section, for example, I thought some of the information about his teammates' performances were unnecessary, but I decided to let those slide because Darling was the captain and their performances did affect him to an extent. If you are planning to nominate this as a Featured Article, I think you should look at trimming the references to his teammates.
I have placed this article on hold until my concerns are addressed. The hold lasts for a maximum of seven days, but I imagine this could be dealt with in five minutes when you have a chance. I have placed the article on my watchlist, so please check off the items as you complete them and I will check back. If you have any concerns about this review, please leave a message here or on my talk page. Best wishes,
GaryColemanFan (
talk)
23:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I have passed the article. If it is possible to make the 5/51, 5/48 and 6/219 more clear, I would appreciate it if this could be done. Good work to all those who contributed to the article. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 23:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
This is probably not a reliable source, but it does make the very interesting claim that Darling was the main opponent of the proposed Commonwealth Powers Act in 1942, and was single-handedly responsible for its demise. If this is true and verifiable, it should certainly be included in the article. St Anselm ( talk) 02:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Joe Darling has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on November 21, 2021. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Good luck with the FT :) dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. I have made it through the first half of the article so far, but I might not be able to finish the review until later today. To speed up the process, I like to post my concerns as I go so that the editor doesn't have to wait until the review is complete to start working on the article. With that said, my concerns so far are as follows:
That's all so far. I will do what I can to complete the review today. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 19:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I have now completed the review. The article is very close to passing.
Is it reasonably well written?
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
Is it broad in its coverage?
Is it neutral?
Is it stable?
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
Overall:
I would like to see the list of my four concerns above addressed. Aside from that, I think this is ready to be passed as a Good Article. I did feel, however, that there were times when the article could be focused better. In the "Captaincy" section, for example, I thought some of the information about his teammates' performances were unnecessary, but I decided to let those slide because Darling was the captain and their performances did affect him to an extent. If you are planning to nominate this as a Featured Article, I think you should look at trimming the references to his teammates.
I have placed this article on hold until my concerns are addressed. The hold lasts for a maximum of seven days, but I imagine this could be dealt with in five minutes when you have a chance. I have placed the article on my watchlist, so please check off the items as you complete them and I will check back. If you have any concerns about this review, please leave a message here or on my talk page. Best wishes,
GaryColemanFan (
talk)
23:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I have passed the article. If it is possible to make the 5/51, 5/48 and 6/219 more clear, I would appreciate it if this could be done. Good work to all those who contributed to the article. GaryColemanFan ( talk) 23:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
This is probably not a reliable source, but it does make the very interesting claim that Darling was the main opponent of the proposed Commonwealth Powers Act in 1942, and was single-handedly responsible for its demise. If this is true and verifiable, it should certainly be included in the article. St Anselm ( talk) 02:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)