![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
"The word 'jitter' can be used to refer to those people who dress mainly in black, keep their hair long and listen to punk rock."
Yep. 80.203.115.12 17:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Most of these are questions about jitter that occurred to me while reading the article.
Maybe I will even try answering some of them. :-)
-- Jtir 21:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, why are you deleting the additions I am making to the Jitter page? -- Daichinger 13:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Unstressed Eye.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay_jitter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.124.85.135 ( talk) 00:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This article appears to be written for an audience that already understands what jitter is. I can't make much sense out of the definition of jitter period at all. A clear example would help. There is a lot of noisy repetition of signal charateristics in the first few paragraphs as well. I came here from a link for jitter buffer, but it is just assumed that the reader understands what this is. I don't know whether it's hardware or software, and no link is given to help me sort it out. My point: the article doesn't stand on its own very well.
99.138.130.71 ( talk) 23:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
There's a lot of information about jitter scattered about Wikipedia. Notably, Analog recording vs. digital recording#Jitter and Analog-to-digital converter#Aperture_error cover important details on sampling jitter. Some other pages probably need to be absorbed into this page.
Because this page covers jitter in a few different contexts, it may be appropriate to break out a separate article sampling jitter, and make that the main article referred to by the Analog v. Digital page. In that case, some of Special:WhatLinksHere/Jitter should be updated. -- 212.44.20.129 ( talk) 15:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
The wander page is more or less already included within the main jitter article, and is a verifiable stub. upvoted. -- 216.157.201.45 ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
What is ITU-T G.810? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.116.140 ( talk) 15:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
What s Jitter an different View? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.174.78 ( talk) 16:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
away from the multimedia stuff. Fgnievinski ( talk) 00:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This article is clear, well-written and with a dry, academic tone. That is one guess I offer why someone might reasonably propose merging related content. Although I'm not volunteering to do it, and where might that precedent end? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjeinca ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
This source shows different numbers, I can't find anything about it in the 802.1 specification.
I think it is better use FiberChannel specifications for this article, because it is more clear on this issue. 95.128.94.226 ( talk) 11:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The link to the Phabrix website in the External Links section seems to be nothing but advertisement, it links to the website of a device manufacturer without any comment why this would be relevant to the article. 193.174.67.20 ( talk) 11:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
"The word 'jitter' can be used to refer to those people who dress mainly in black, keep their hair long and listen to punk rock."
Yep. 80.203.115.12 17:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Most of these are questions about jitter that occurred to me while reading the article.
Maybe I will even try answering some of them. :-)
-- Jtir 21:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, why are you deleting the additions I am making to the Jitter page? -- Daichinger 13:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Unstressed Eye.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delay_jitter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.124.85.135 ( talk) 00:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
This article appears to be written for an audience that already understands what jitter is. I can't make much sense out of the definition of jitter period at all. A clear example would help. There is a lot of noisy repetition of signal charateristics in the first few paragraphs as well. I came here from a link for jitter buffer, but it is just assumed that the reader understands what this is. I don't know whether it's hardware or software, and no link is given to help me sort it out. My point: the article doesn't stand on its own very well.
99.138.130.71 ( talk) 23:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
There's a lot of information about jitter scattered about Wikipedia. Notably, Analog recording vs. digital recording#Jitter and Analog-to-digital converter#Aperture_error cover important details on sampling jitter. Some other pages probably need to be absorbed into this page.
Because this page covers jitter in a few different contexts, it may be appropriate to break out a separate article sampling jitter, and make that the main article referred to by the Analog v. Digital page. In that case, some of Special:WhatLinksHere/Jitter should be updated. -- 212.44.20.129 ( talk) 15:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
The wander page is more or less already included within the main jitter article, and is a verifiable stub. upvoted. -- 216.157.201.45 ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
What is ITU-T G.810? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.116.140 ( talk) 15:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
What s Jitter an different View? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.174.78 ( talk) 16:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
away from the multimedia stuff. Fgnievinski ( talk) 00:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
This article is clear, well-written and with a dry, academic tone. That is one guess I offer why someone might reasonably propose merging related content. Although I'm not volunteering to do it, and where might that precedent end? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjeinca ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
This source shows different numbers, I can't find anything about it in the 802.1 specification.
I think it is better use FiberChannel specifications for this article, because it is more clear on this issue. 95.128.94.226 ( talk) 11:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The link to the Phabrix website in the External Links section seems to be nothing but advertisement, it links to the website of a device manufacturer without any comment why this would be relevant to the article. 193.174.67.20 ( talk) 11:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)