GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Bridies ( talk · contribs) 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Starting review. bridies ( talk) 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
1. Seems reasonably well-written; will copy edit later.
2.
3.
4
5
I hate when they use these stupid automatic templates for references too, I always try to spend these few seconds to write one properly. There are tons of possible refs for "Jill sandwich". And by "tons", I mean about 188,000. Besides its use in Dead Rising, the meme also entered Capcom merch: [2] -- Niemti ( talk) 13:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Btw, just what the hell is "a Blossom vibe"? -- Niemti ( talk) 18:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.gamesradar.com/top-20-overlooked-game-babes/?page=2 I wanted to link it something, but I have no idea. Maybe it's by the same GR guy who was talking about "Kazumi" and some cryptic "Ruby" in another article. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Failed The reception is still strongly weighted towards sex appeal and lacks any substantial discussion, other than cursory quotes, of other aspects; the section appears to be organised entirely from the perspective of evaluating her sex appeal and thus lacks breadth and neutrality. The photo still lacks authorship information: this issue hasn't been addressed nor even acknowledged. bridies ( talk) 05:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
The reception is based only on what exists (like there was nothing to answer the "why" in your question above), and not something what you want to magically appear, and just yesterday you had no problems with lack of negative reception for Tifa in her shitty article from few months ago. You're well aware I don't know how ideal image boxes should look like, so I'm not doing it, but your "I'm not sure" became suddenly "I'm sure". -- Niemti ( talk) 05:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Also: "the section appears to be organised entirely from the perspective of evaluating her sex appeal" LOL NO. It covers everything that is available, in detail and and without bias. It represents the actual real world reception of the character, not your make-believe wishful thinking that will not become reality no matter how much you demand. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
No, "there was nothing to answer the "why" in your question above" BECAUSE SHE WAS JUST ONE OF THE FOUR ADDITIONAL CHARACTERS ON THE LAST PAGE THAT DIDN'T FIT INTO THE "TOP 7" ARTICLE BUT WERE SIMPLY INCLUDED IN TOP 11, AND SO IT CONTAINED NO TEXT WHATSOEVER. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
No, you used "why?" only once. Now you're either being ignorant (in this case, click alt+F and check) or blatantly lying for no reason / for sport. OK, I'm unwathcing this. -- Niemti ( talk) 07:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Bridies ( talk · contribs) 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Starting review. bridies ( talk) 17:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
1. Seems reasonably well-written; will copy edit later.
2.
3.
4
5
I hate when they use these stupid automatic templates for references too, I always try to spend these few seconds to write one properly. There are tons of possible refs for "Jill sandwich". And by "tons", I mean about 188,000. Besides its use in Dead Rising, the meme also entered Capcom merch: [2] -- Niemti ( talk) 13:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Btw, just what the hell is "a Blossom vibe"? -- Niemti ( talk) 18:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
http://www.gamesradar.com/top-20-overlooked-game-babes/?page=2 I wanted to link it something, but I have no idea. Maybe it's by the same GR guy who was talking about "Kazumi" and some cryptic "Ruby" in another article. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Failed The reception is still strongly weighted towards sex appeal and lacks any substantial discussion, other than cursory quotes, of other aspects; the section appears to be organised entirely from the perspective of evaluating her sex appeal and thus lacks breadth and neutrality. The photo still lacks authorship information: this issue hasn't been addressed nor even acknowledged. bridies ( talk) 05:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
The reception is based only on what exists (like there was nothing to answer the "why" in your question above), and not something what you want to magically appear, and just yesterday you had no problems with lack of negative reception for Tifa in her shitty article from few months ago. You're well aware I don't know how ideal image boxes should look like, so I'm not doing it, but your "I'm not sure" became suddenly "I'm sure". -- Niemti ( talk) 05:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Also: "the section appears to be organised entirely from the perspective of evaluating her sex appeal" LOL NO. It covers everything that is available, in detail and and without bias. It represents the actual real world reception of the character, not your make-believe wishful thinking that will not become reality no matter how much you demand. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
No, "there was nothing to answer the "why" in your question above" BECAUSE SHE WAS JUST ONE OF THE FOUR ADDITIONAL CHARACTERS ON THE LAST PAGE THAT DIDN'T FIT INTO THE "TOP 7" ARTICLE BUT WERE SIMPLY INCLUDED IN TOP 11, AND SO IT CONTAINED NO TEXT WHATSOEVER. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
No, you used "why?" only once. Now you're either being ignorant (in this case, click alt+F and check) or blatantly lying for no reason / for sport. OK, I'm unwathcing this. -- Niemti ( talk) 07:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)