From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Potential undue content in history

Is every statement the group makes notable for inclusion in WP? Content here already potentially meets WP:Undue I.am.a.qwerty ( talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I think it would be unnecessary to include statements that can only be sourced to their website, but if it’s newsworthy then that’s a different story
Also it’s in a list-ish format as I’m just getting the information on there, I’ll probably go back and synthesise it a bit more but anyone can do that at any time. GraziePrego ( talk) 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Potential undue content in history

Is every statement the group makes notable for inclusion in WP? Content here already potentially meets WP:Undue I.am.a.qwerty ( talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

I think it would be unnecessary to include statements that can only be sourced to their website, but if it’s newsworthy then that’s a different story
Also it’s in a list-ish format as I’m just getting the information on there, I’ll probably go back and synthesise it a bit more but anyone can do that at any time. GraziePrego ( talk) 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook