GA nomination successful following prompt improvements
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why isn't
Phoebe Bridgers in the "artist" field given her guest vocals?
Technically she isn't billed as a featured artist despite having an entire solo verse and shared vocals in the final chorus. Liner notes credit her as "additional vocals" for the track. I've never really encountered this situation before, so I'm not sure what to do. I've noticed that Travis Scott similarly doesn't list "featured artists" on Astroworld, but the "
Sicko Mode" infobox credits Drake. What do you think I should do with it? Giacobbetalk23:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I agree. Don't understand why she isn't formally credit, but that's not my place lol. I've added her into a "credits" section and removed her singles chronology from the infobox. I can add it back if you disagree. Giacobbetalk14:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Not sure what "understated" in "understated composition" is supposed to mean, but that regardless doesn't read very well. Just keep it simple and say "the composition" or "its composition".
Not seeing anything on "Music for Cars" being split into two albums within
eitherreference provided for that bit. You'll need a separate source for that part, which I did find
here.
Per WP:REPCITE, you don't need to use the same citation more than once in a row within a paragraph. This means the second paragraph of the section only has to use ref#1 (Music Week) at the end of "more ambiguous with its subject matter".
Good eye! Don't know how I missed that. As for the length, AllMusic says it's 4:23, Spotify (album + single) and Apple Music list it at 4:24. I've updated it with a source from the latter. Giacobbetalk19:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Gigwise is a subpar source. Try to find something more credible.
I may have confused that with Entertainmentwise, but am pretty sure it's something I've seen others advise against using within articles due to a gossipy nature. Either way, there's no doubt that stronger sources exist.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
02:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Both Dork and Riot are trustworthy. Both are UK-based (and UK-centric lol) magazines focused primarily on the indie/rock scene. Both magazines are offered in print and online formats.
The file
File:Bruce Springsteen 1988.jpg was derived from appears to have been deleted, and it's not the clearest shot of The Boss anyway (even though I have a feeling you may have intentionally chosen one where he has a cross necklace given this song's theme). I recommend simply removing that when somewhat decorative compared to the use of Bridgers (who was actually was featured on the track unlike him). On that note,
File:Phoebe Bridgers (41599189180) (cropped).jpg is perfectly fine to use.
To avoid WP:SYNTH in regards to reception assessments, you should add a reference that specifically mentions overall favorable/mixed/unfavorable reviews from critics to support the section's first sentence. That also goes for saying our guest vocalist got "near-unanimous praise".
Unless I've missed something,
Spin doesn't seem particularly positive or negative on the song, though it regardless does note that the track is a musical departure from the band's other material
At the end of "was commissioned to create an art film for 'Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America'", there's an extra space between refs#36 and 38 that should be removed
More WP:REPCITE with citation#38. It only needs to be mentioned at the end of the above listed sentence and "omitting the audio from 'Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America'".
Referencing: A couple bits not supported by given citations. By the way,
New Zealand Hot Singles (what this entered) isn't the same thing as the main
New Zealand song chart. Both are valid to use, and I can see why one would think of them as the same thing, but I wanted to be sure you knew there was a difference.
Coverage: Every major aspect appears to have been addressed without excess detail
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA nomination successful following prompt improvements
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why isn't
Phoebe Bridgers in the "artist" field given her guest vocals?
Technically she isn't billed as a featured artist despite having an entire solo verse and shared vocals in the final chorus. Liner notes credit her as "additional vocals" for the track. I've never really encountered this situation before, so I'm not sure what to do. I've noticed that Travis Scott similarly doesn't list "featured artists" on Astroworld, but the "
Sicko Mode" infobox credits Drake. What do you think I should do with it? Giacobbetalk23:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I agree. Don't understand why she isn't formally credit, but that's not my place lol. I've added her into a "credits" section and removed her singles chronology from the infobox. I can add it back if you disagree. Giacobbetalk14:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Not sure what "understated" in "understated composition" is supposed to mean, but that regardless doesn't read very well. Just keep it simple and say "the composition" or "its composition".
Not seeing anything on "Music for Cars" being split into two albums within
eitherreference provided for that bit. You'll need a separate source for that part, which I did find
here.
Per WP:REPCITE, you don't need to use the same citation more than once in a row within a paragraph. This means the second paragraph of the section only has to use ref#1 (Music Week) at the end of "more ambiguous with its subject matter".
Good eye! Don't know how I missed that. As for the length, AllMusic says it's 4:23, Spotify (album + single) and Apple Music list it at 4:24. I've updated it with a source from the latter. Giacobbetalk19:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Gigwise is a subpar source. Try to find something more credible.
I may have confused that with Entertainmentwise, but am pretty sure it's something I've seen others advise against using within articles due to a gossipy nature. Either way, there's no doubt that stronger sources exist.
SNUGGUMS (
talk /
edits)
02:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Both Dork and Riot are trustworthy. Both are UK-based (and UK-centric lol) magazines focused primarily on the indie/rock scene. Both magazines are offered in print and online formats.
The file
File:Bruce Springsteen 1988.jpg was derived from appears to have been deleted, and it's not the clearest shot of The Boss anyway (even though I have a feeling you may have intentionally chosen one where he has a cross necklace given this song's theme). I recommend simply removing that when somewhat decorative compared to the use of Bridgers (who was actually was featured on the track unlike him). On that note,
File:Phoebe Bridgers (41599189180) (cropped).jpg is perfectly fine to use.
To avoid WP:SYNTH in regards to reception assessments, you should add a reference that specifically mentions overall favorable/mixed/unfavorable reviews from critics to support the section's first sentence. That also goes for saying our guest vocalist got "near-unanimous praise".
Unless I've missed something,
Spin doesn't seem particularly positive or negative on the song, though it regardless does note that the track is a musical departure from the band's other material
At the end of "was commissioned to create an art film for 'Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America'", there's an extra space between refs#36 and 38 that should be removed
More WP:REPCITE with citation#38. It only needs to be mentioned at the end of the above listed sentence and "omitting the audio from 'Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America'".
Referencing: A couple bits not supported by given citations. By the way,
New Zealand Hot Singles (what this entered) isn't the same thing as the main
New Zealand song chart. Both are valid to use, and I can see why one would think of them as the same thing, but I wanted to be sure you knew there was a difference.
Coverage: Every major aspect appears to have been addressed without excess detail
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.