![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jesuits and Nazi Germany's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "William L. Shirer p240":
Reference named "Ian Kershaw p.823":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Either the title should be changed or the article rewritten. Xx236 ( talk) 09:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Please read WP:Plagiarism#Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia
This article contains Wikipedia:Copyright violations because when it was created text was copied from one or more Wikipedia articles (for example Catholic resistance to Nazi Germany). I also suspect that there are copies from other pages. Before the {{ copyvio}} template is removed from the article the article history it there must be adequate attribution of all the text that was copied see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
-- PBS ( talk) 06:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jesuits and Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jesuits and Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Maybe the most important reason for dedain regarging Jesuites throughout modern Europe was their massive support for "Great Poland" not only including strong nationalist ideology, but, according to some critics, also racial national-occultistic activities comparable to activities perfomed by NS-leaders like Mussolini and Hitler later on, building up "the great slavic nation of catholic believe", or rather a great panslavistic race under catholic control, which had been exclusively the "Polish race", later on meaning the re-established Poland, and no other country: All comparable countries in the East had been orthodox, not catholic. Poland therefore had been in the focus of the Jesuit Order. Therefore the Jesuits massively supported the leaders of Polish nationalist military regimes, such as dictators and racists, committing excessive crimes against ethnic minorities. After invading other contries, Polish elite did massive ethnic cleansing and extiction efforts, mainly against Ukrainians, but even against (catholic!) Hungarians and Austrians. The Jesuits did not bother, nor did they oppose to Polish nationalist crimes, as it also had been their project, the victims had been either non-catholic, especially of orthodox believe, or their believe did not matter to the Jesuits, as they regarded the expansion of the "Great Polish Nation" to be more important. As catholic fundamentalists, the Jeuit leaders used nationalism and panslavism, where it was helpful or conveniant for them, but as a religios order, claiming extreme spiritual superiority to others, they had their own anti-humanistic agenda. In fact, panslavism is older than its modern European equivalents and had been a very useful tool for Jesuits in Poland, as well as the Jeuits had been very helpful for Polish imperialism and colonialism, especially regarding crimes agains orthodox Ukranians. As Jesuits massively promoted "Catholic Great Poland", annexing large parts of Ukrainia and Czeslovakia, their role is not "antifascistic" in a democratic or humanistic sense, but rather in an anti-democratic and anti-humanistic sense, as the Jesuits saw themselves as - and scientifically must been seen as - anti-democratic rivals to the anti-democratic NS-regime. Therefore: More likely political and totalitarian rivals, rather than victims of the NS-regime. Regarding the classic standpoint of the Protestant Churches in Europe, as well as the English Masons, or regarding the standpoint of various prominent Europeans, e. g. such as Friedrich Engels, Otto von Bismarck-Schoenhausen, Winston Churchill or Charles de Gaulle concerning Jesuits, there had been obvious reservations against Jesuit leaders and against their catholic nation building project in Poland - as mentioned sometimes including racist techniques of ethnic cleansing, mainly murdering Ukrainians. No surprise that their racist rivals such as Hitler had an aggressive and cruel approach to fight Jesuits as opposed racist players. -- 188.99.105.13 ( talk) 12:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jesuits and Nazi Germany's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "William L. Shirer p240":
Reference named "Ian Kershaw p.823":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Either the title should be changed or the article rewritten. Xx236 ( talk) 09:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Please read WP:Plagiarism#Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia
This article contains Wikipedia:Copyright violations because when it was created text was copied from one or more Wikipedia articles (for example Catholic resistance to Nazi Germany). I also suspect that there are copies from other pages. Before the {{ copyvio}} template is removed from the article the article history it there must be adequate attribution of all the text that was copied see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
-- PBS ( talk) 06:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jesuits and Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 21:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jesuits and Nazi Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Maybe the most important reason for dedain regarging Jesuites throughout modern Europe was their massive support for "Great Poland" not only including strong nationalist ideology, but, according to some critics, also racial national-occultistic activities comparable to activities perfomed by NS-leaders like Mussolini and Hitler later on, building up "the great slavic nation of catholic believe", or rather a great panslavistic race under catholic control, which had been exclusively the "Polish race", later on meaning the re-established Poland, and no other country: All comparable countries in the East had been orthodox, not catholic. Poland therefore had been in the focus of the Jesuit Order. Therefore the Jesuits massively supported the leaders of Polish nationalist military regimes, such as dictators and racists, committing excessive crimes against ethnic minorities. After invading other contries, Polish elite did massive ethnic cleansing and extiction efforts, mainly against Ukrainians, but even against (catholic!) Hungarians and Austrians. The Jesuits did not bother, nor did they oppose to Polish nationalist crimes, as it also had been their project, the victims had been either non-catholic, especially of orthodox believe, or their believe did not matter to the Jesuits, as they regarded the expansion of the "Great Polish Nation" to be more important. As catholic fundamentalists, the Jeuit leaders used nationalism and panslavism, where it was helpful or conveniant for them, but as a religios order, claiming extreme spiritual superiority to others, they had their own anti-humanistic agenda. In fact, panslavism is older than its modern European equivalents and had been a very useful tool for Jesuits in Poland, as well as the Jeuits had been very helpful for Polish imperialism and colonialism, especially regarding crimes agains orthodox Ukranians. As Jesuits massively promoted "Catholic Great Poland", annexing large parts of Ukrainia and Czeslovakia, their role is not "antifascistic" in a democratic or humanistic sense, but rather in an anti-democratic and anti-humanistic sense, as the Jesuits saw themselves as - and scientifically must been seen as - anti-democratic rivals to the anti-democratic NS-regime. Therefore: More likely political and totalitarian rivals, rather than victims of the NS-regime. Regarding the classic standpoint of the Protestant Churches in Europe, as well as the English Masons, or regarding the standpoint of various prominent Europeans, e. g. such as Friedrich Engels, Otto von Bismarck-Schoenhausen, Winston Churchill or Charles de Gaulle concerning Jesuits, there had been obvious reservations against Jesuit leaders and against their catholic nation building project in Poland - as mentioned sometimes including racist techniques of ethnic cleansing, mainly murdering Ukrainians. No surprise that their racist rivals such as Hitler had an aggressive and cruel approach to fight Jesuits as opposed racist players. -- 188.99.105.13 ( talk) 12:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)