This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This redirect is supported by the military biography work group. United States: Texas This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles This redirect is supported by WikiProject Texas. Military history: North America / United States This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force

Could you perhaps, maybe, possibly quote the part of the article that says "some" because I could not find that. I may not know all the wikipedia rules, but I would guess that when something has such common knowledge amongst people that it is common sense, then a source would not be needed

I disagree that it is "common knowledge" that "most people" believe the documents are forgeries. If it is indeed common knowledge than it should be easy to find a source. "Most" is inappropriate given the lack of such a source, and if you feel "some" is inappropriate as well, then we should just delete the part about forgeries. Gamaliel 04:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Why don't we change the wording to "and are widely considered to be" I think that would satisfy us both. Whadda ya think?

As much as I consider Jerry Killian to be a notable figure, almost nothing in this article actually pertains to his life. The article doesn't even know the year in which he was born and the last two paragraphs are more about the Killian documents than the man or his accomplishments. I propose this article redirect to the Killian documents.

Killian441 ( talk) 03:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Did this -- Killian441 ( talk) 21:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply