![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | Jeremiah Lisbo ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 26 August 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my opinion, Lisbo meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. These are the media sources that discuss him extensively, and which are cited in the same article (these are separate from the half a dozen other reliable media sources that mention him in a non-trivial fashion):
Moreover, per WP: Multiple sources, "based on existing Wikipedia community norms, it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in reliable sources that are independent of each other." I have listed more than 3 above.
For this reason, I am removing the notability tag on this article. The notability templates are added to articles which the tagger believes are reasonably likely to be non-notable. As mentioned, the figure in question has been covered extensively in reliable media sources.
If there are disagreements, I would welcome discussion here.
Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 19:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
An editor has taken the liberty of removing factual information about Lisbo's talent agencies, with the accusation that such factual information is "promotional." I have since reverted these deletions. I can understand that someone not familiar with the Philippine entertainment industry would think that, but I would suggest they do more research into this rather than summarily deleting factual information and casting it as promotional, without evidence. As demonstrated in the article, such information is factual and newsworthy; the information was covered in the Manila Bulletin and the Philippine Star, thereby proving it is not merely "promotional" (unless, of course, they think two media outlets are somehow related to Lisbo and are trying to promote him). I suggest they do some Google News searching of "Star Magic" or "Rise Artists Studio."
Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 18:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
It is just simple removal. It is better to just say "Star Cinema" than "Star Cinema, the largest film production in the Philippines". MaccWiki ( talk) 09:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Once again, an editor has taken the liberty of removing factual statements without any basis for doing so. The statement is that Star Cinema is the largest film studio in the Philippines. After I provided a reliable reference, which is an academic source, it was again reverted by a different editor. I have now opened this discussion for the editors to please explain how a journal article is not a reliable resource. Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 08:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Where in your provided source is the statement saying that Star Cinema is the largest Film production in the Philippines. MaccWiki ( talk) 08:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Much better if you added direct source, like just one tap then you can read the sentence. You added complicated source. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Edit war?. You are the one adding source without mentioning that Star Cinema is the largest film production. You are must be banned at Wikipedia not me. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
I read the whole sentences in the source you provided but the source didn't mentioned that Star Cinema is the largest film production in the Philippines. So i remove it. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Is this a joke!?. Download first. Read later?. Well you need to find MUCH BETTER SOURCE. for that statement. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION: Go on this page ( Star Cinema). Then look if there is a statement claiming that Star Cinema is the largest film studio in the Philippines. If you didn't see that statement, means no need to add that statement to a BLP page like Jeremiah Lisbo. MaccWiki ( talk) 03:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The article has no problem. So what's the reason why should i revert deleted contents from this article? MaccWiki ( talk) 05:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
As discussed above, there is currently a dispute as to whether a phrase about Star Cinema being the largest film studio in the Philippines should be included in this article. Please read the discussion above in its entirety ( Talk:Jeremiah Lisbo#Journal Article Reference) for full context before commenting. Koikefan ( talk) 05:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I believe that Star Cinema is ONE OF THE LARGEST FILM PRODUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES. But not the largest.
One source is not enough to say that Star Cinema is the largest Film production in the Philippines. MaccWiki ( talk) 23:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | Jeremiah Lisbo ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 26 August 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my opinion, Lisbo meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. These are the media sources that discuss him extensively, and which are cited in the same article (these are separate from the half a dozen other reliable media sources that mention him in a non-trivial fashion):
Moreover, per WP: Multiple sources, "based on existing Wikipedia community norms, it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in reliable sources that are independent of each other." I have listed more than 3 above.
For this reason, I am removing the notability tag on this article. The notability templates are added to articles which the tagger believes are reasonably likely to be non-notable. As mentioned, the figure in question has been covered extensively in reliable media sources.
If there are disagreements, I would welcome discussion here.
Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 19:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
An editor has taken the liberty of removing factual information about Lisbo's talent agencies, with the accusation that such factual information is "promotional." I have since reverted these deletions. I can understand that someone not familiar with the Philippine entertainment industry would think that, but I would suggest they do more research into this rather than summarily deleting factual information and casting it as promotional, without evidence. As demonstrated in the article, such information is factual and newsworthy; the information was covered in the Manila Bulletin and the Philippine Star, thereby proving it is not merely "promotional" (unless, of course, they think two media outlets are somehow related to Lisbo and are trying to promote him). I suggest they do some Google News searching of "Star Magic" or "Rise Artists Studio."
Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 18:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
It is just simple removal. It is better to just say "Star Cinema" than "Star Cinema, the largest film production in the Philippines". MaccWiki ( talk) 09:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Once again, an editor has taken the liberty of removing factual statements without any basis for doing so. The statement is that Star Cinema is the largest film studio in the Philippines. After I provided a reliable reference, which is an academic source, it was again reverted by a different editor. I have now opened this discussion for the editors to please explain how a journal article is not a reliable resource. Thank you. Koikefan ( talk) 08:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Where in your provided source is the statement saying that Star Cinema is the largest Film production in the Philippines. MaccWiki ( talk) 08:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Much better if you added direct source, like just one tap then you can read the sentence. You added complicated source. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Edit war?. You are the one adding source without mentioning that Star Cinema is the largest film production. You are must be banned at Wikipedia not me. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
I read the whole sentences in the source you provided but the source didn't mentioned that Star Cinema is the largest film production in the Philippines. So i remove it. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Is this a joke!?. Download first. Read later?. Well you need to find MUCH BETTER SOURCE. for that statement. MaccWiki ( talk) 09:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION: Go on this page ( Star Cinema). Then look if there is a statement claiming that Star Cinema is the largest film studio in the Philippines. If you didn't see that statement, means no need to add that statement to a BLP page like Jeremiah Lisbo. MaccWiki ( talk) 03:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The article has no problem. So what's the reason why should i revert deleted contents from this article? MaccWiki ( talk) 05:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
As discussed above, there is currently a dispute as to whether a phrase about Star Cinema being the largest film studio in the Philippines should be included in this article. Please read the discussion above in its entirety ( Talk:Jeremiah Lisbo#Journal Article Reference) for full context before commenting. Koikefan ( talk) 05:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I believe that Star Cinema is ONE OF THE LARGEST FILM PRODUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES. But not the largest.
One source is not enough to say that Star Cinema is the largest Film production in the Philippines. MaccWiki ( talk) 23:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)