Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I'll have this done by tomorrow. JAG UAR  16:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

I look forward to it :) Snuggums ( talk / edits) 16:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   It is well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• "Lawrence is known in the media for being a vocal advocate of feminism and gender equality" - might be beneficial to link Feminism here (or Feminism in the United States, or even another one of the articles related to it)
• "She is the youngest woman to accrue four Academy Award nominations" - the lead says she is the youngest woman, whereas the "2014–present: Established actress" section states she is the youngest person
• "She then appeared in The Beaver, a black comedy directed by Jodie Foster" - was this film released in 2011?
• "The Devil You Know, a small-scale feature that Lawrence had filmed for back in 2005 was her first release of 2013" - feature film?
• "In 2013, Time magazine named her one of the most 100 influential people in the world" - Time is already linked before, so de-link it here
• " In 2015. Lawrence was named "Entertainer of the Year" by Entertainment Weekly—a title she won also in 2012" - a title she also won in 2012
• "She has also won a BAFTA Award for..." - BAFTA is always used without the "award" after it
• Ref 80 and ref 126 are dead
• Is AskMen a reliable source? I wouldn't know because I don't review film articles as much as I used to!

There was a discussion about it on the article's talk. I added that it just has an opinion about how sexy certain women are so I think it is fine. I also had no problem about it in my other FAs, so..

I done a full review of this but couldn't find many issues to raise. The article is well written, comprehensive, and all of the sources check out. I found a couple of dead links, but other than that there were no issues with venerability. Excellent work! I'll leave this on hold until all of the above are clarified. JAG UAR  19:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you, Jaguar. I have addressed your concerns. – FrB.TG ( talk) 20:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Did some of the others. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Yup, I should have said "we". :) FrB.TG ( talk) 20:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you both! By all means, let's promote this. It well and truly meets the criteria, as evidenced by my short and lacklustre review LOL. I also want to congratulate you on the work, definitely FA material. JAG UAR  23:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply