This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sonalp123, Asingh2626.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
As with the earlier Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Foswiki article, this fork/rename is probably not notable enough in its own right yet to warrant its own page.
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that a content fork that has resulted in two different names for software that is otherwise nearly identical has led to a content fork here that has again resulted in two different names for articles that are otherwise nearly identical? But I think that, until such time as there is some significant difference in the material that should be in the two articles, they should be merged into a single article. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I think they should be two articles, until it becomes clear that hudson is no longer actively developed (if that happens). 109.231.237.58 ( talk) 11:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
"Based on the original Jenkins for Java, there are now similar tools for other programming frameworks such as: Buildbot — a Python system to automate the compile/test cycle to validate code changes."
According to their respective Wikipedia pages, Buildbot is older than Jenkins or Hudson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.208.41.246 ( talk) 22:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
On
http://jenkins-ci.org at the very top "Jenkins" calls itself "an extendable open source automation server".
Shouldn't we mention the term "automation server" at a rather prominent place?
Maybe somebody more courageous than me wants to go and put it somewhere in the introduction ...
BTW: IMHO "automation server" expresses Jenkins's powers far better than "continuous integration tool",
as "continuous ..." still has this "build" connotation,
and nowadays Jenkins gets employed in far more contexts than just "build automation".--
johayek (
talk)
15:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
The section Other frameworks is informative but it is out of context. It talks about tools for other programming languages. It should be overwritten or deleted. -- Kizar ( talk) 20:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
tox
and Django-Jenkins don't belong in this list: they're not frameworks that invoke tests. They are interface layers between a test scheduling framework, such as Jenkins, and a build process and testing script.I am wondering what makes more sense – updating the "latest release version" with
I would actually like to see the LTS Release and also the more frequently updated one listed in the Infobox software. (I looked around a little ( Template_talk:Infobox_software, Ubuntu (operating system)), but I did not find a similar discussion there.) But occasional swapping between the two release lines does not make sense to me. I wonder whether User:GauravJShah will read this and will also share his point of view here.-- johayek ( talk) 13:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Agree with johayek , We should have both versions listed here. I too had looked that Ubuntu to check if there was anything similar there. LTS does qualify for the "Stable Release" category. Not sure if we can use the "Preview Release" category for the weekly release as it is not exactly a preview release -- gaurav —Preceding undated comment added 13:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Reference [7] is broken, and references [8] to [16] are missing.
I haven't looked into it much, and I won't probably be fixing it myself, whoever does can delete this talk section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrolf ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The references were somehow wrecked by this edit by a new user, which is now impossible to automatically undo without losing subsequent changes. Smyth ( talk) 13:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Fixed reference 14: [1]. Compare with the original version: [2]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 19:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed references 2, 5, and 6: [3]. Compare with the original version: [4]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 20:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed reference 7: [5]. Compare with the original version: [6]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 20:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed error on reference 6 by removing coauthor and changing author to the correct user [7]. The correct link for reference 7 appears to be https://community.oracle.com/docs/DOC-922314 , but this page does not list Jenkins as a winner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.94.224.233 ( talk) 19:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
[7] could be repointed to http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080506005835/en/Sixth-Annual-Dukes-Choice-Awards-Spotlights-2008s which seems to have a complete list of winners as opposed to the currently referenced page which only has 4 winners and Hudson is not actually included as one of those 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:420:303:1250:8DE0:9070:BD47:ADF3 ( talk) 21:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jenkins (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Is it named after Jenkins from Scooby-Doo? 89.64.68.220 ( talk) 14:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sonalp123, Asingh2626.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
As with the earlier Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Foswiki article, this fork/rename is probably not notable enough in its own right yet to warrant its own page.
Am I the only one that finds it ironic that a content fork that has resulted in two different names for software that is otherwise nearly identical has led to a content fork here that has again resulted in two different names for articles that are otherwise nearly identical? But I think that, until such time as there is some significant difference in the material that should be in the two articles, they should be merged into a single article. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I think they should be two articles, until it becomes clear that hudson is no longer actively developed (if that happens). 109.231.237.58 ( talk) 11:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
"Based on the original Jenkins for Java, there are now similar tools for other programming frameworks such as: Buildbot — a Python system to automate the compile/test cycle to validate code changes."
According to their respective Wikipedia pages, Buildbot is older than Jenkins or Hudson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.208.41.246 ( talk) 22:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
On
http://jenkins-ci.org at the very top "Jenkins" calls itself "an extendable open source automation server".
Shouldn't we mention the term "automation server" at a rather prominent place?
Maybe somebody more courageous than me wants to go and put it somewhere in the introduction ...
BTW: IMHO "automation server" expresses Jenkins's powers far better than "continuous integration tool",
as "continuous ..." still has this "build" connotation,
and nowadays Jenkins gets employed in far more contexts than just "build automation".--
johayek (
talk)
15:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
The section Other frameworks is informative but it is out of context. It talks about tools for other programming languages. It should be overwritten or deleted. -- Kizar ( talk) 20:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
tox
and Django-Jenkins don't belong in this list: they're not frameworks that invoke tests. They are interface layers between a test scheduling framework, such as Jenkins, and a build process and testing script.I am wondering what makes more sense – updating the "latest release version" with
I would actually like to see the LTS Release and also the more frequently updated one listed in the Infobox software. (I looked around a little ( Template_talk:Infobox_software, Ubuntu (operating system)), but I did not find a similar discussion there.) But occasional swapping between the two release lines does not make sense to me. I wonder whether User:GauravJShah will read this and will also share his point of view here.-- johayek ( talk) 13:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Agree with johayek , We should have both versions listed here. I too had looked that Ubuntu to check if there was anything similar there. LTS does qualify for the "Stable Release" category. Not sure if we can use the "Preview Release" category for the weekly release as it is not exactly a preview release -- gaurav —Preceding undated comment added 13:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Reference [7] is broken, and references [8] to [16] are missing.
I haven't looked into it much, and I won't probably be fixing it myself, whoever does can delete this talk section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrolf ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The references were somehow wrecked by this edit by a new user, which is now impossible to automatically undo without losing subsequent changes. Smyth ( talk) 13:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Fixed reference 14: [1]. Compare with the original version: [2]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 19:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed references 2, 5, and 6: [3]. Compare with the original version: [4]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 20:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed reference 7: [5]. Compare with the original version: [6]. 167.107.191.217 ( talk) 20:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed error on reference 6 by removing coauthor and changing author to the correct user [7]. The correct link for reference 7 appears to be https://community.oracle.com/docs/DOC-922314 , but this page does not list Jenkins as a winner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.94.224.233 ( talk) 19:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
[7] could be repointed to http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080506005835/en/Sixth-Annual-Dukes-Choice-Awards-Spotlights-2008s which seems to have a complete list of winners as opposed to the currently referenced page which only has 4 winners and Hudson is not actually included as one of those 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:420:303:1250:8DE0:9070:BD47:ADF3 ( talk) 21:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jenkins (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Is it named after Jenkins from Scooby-Doo? 89.64.68.220 ( talk) 14:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)