![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I moved this article from "Jefferson College (Mississippi)" to "Jefferson College (Washington, Mississippi)". My partially incorrect edit label was: "use more common (City, State) disambiguation. also separate from other Jefferson College, a 2 year one, in Mississippi".
This engendered comment at my Talk page: Allstarecho notes "...there is no other Jefferson College in Mississippi. There's a 2 year Jefferson College in Missouri, but there are no others in Mississippi. Therefore, you should undo the move. - ✰ ALLST☆R✰ echo 22:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)"
My response: It was my mistake in the move description. I had misunderstood the 2 year college was in Missouri rather than Mississippi, which i noticed afterward while further editing Jefferson College disambiguation. However, I still prefer the (City, State) style disambiguation for the Mississippi one. The (City, State) style of disambiguation in article titles is clear and is the most commonly used in NRHP article names. There may be no other Jefferson College in Mississippi, but (Washington, Mississippi) is not wrong. It is easier to refer to and doesn't require excessive explanation about whether it is in state of Washington or what. For example consider usage in the disambiguation page Jefferson College as:
rather than:
which looks like a possible mistake, and versus
which is kind of extra redundant.
All that said, I don't care terribly much. But, why not keep it at (Washington, Mississippi)? doncram ( talk) 22:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
The article states: “Due to falling enrollment and financial difficulties associated with negative public attitudes towards the Vietnam War, the last classes were held in 1964.” Negative public attitudes toward the Vietnam War? In 1964? In Mississippi?
I find this explanation most unlikely. In 1964, a large scale anti-war sentiment was still in the future…and far away from Dixie. I suppose declining enrollment seems likely, though one wonders why. This was during the heigth of the baby boom generation for age-appropriate boys, and why would this particularly venerable Southern military academy fail while others survived even in the North? There was insufficient interest in the military academy located in the Deep South that Jefferson Davis graduated from?
As recently as 1958, the school’s cadets appeared in a memorable scene from the Civil War movie The Horse Soldiers in which there seemed to be no shortage of cadets, and I assume the older boys were excluded (those in the movie ranged from age nine to sixteen) due to the time period of the movie when the older cadets would have been off to war. (By the way, shouldn’t their appearance in the noted John Ford movie be mentioned in the article?):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZKxXNzjfPk
http://mmiarchivist.blogspot.com/2009/12/horse-soldiers-1959.html
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EAmjJVcxyFXHX0cjFIjsXw?feat=embedwebsite: HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 13:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jefferson College (Mississippi). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I moved this article from "Jefferson College (Mississippi)" to "Jefferson College (Washington, Mississippi)". My partially incorrect edit label was: "use more common (City, State) disambiguation. also separate from other Jefferson College, a 2 year one, in Mississippi".
This engendered comment at my Talk page: Allstarecho notes "...there is no other Jefferson College in Mississippi. There's a 2 year Jefferson College in Missouri, but there are no others in Mississippi. Therefore, you should undo the move. - ✰ ALLST☆R✰ echo 22:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)"
My response: It was my mistake in the move description. I had misunderstood the 2 year college was in Missouri rather than Mississippi, which i noticed afterward while further editing Jefferson College disambiguation. However, I still prefer the (City, State) style disambiguation for the Mississippi one. The (City, State) style of disambiguation in article titles is clear and is the most commonly used in NRHP article names. There may be no other Jefferson College in Mississippi, but (Washington, Mississippi) is not wrong. It is easier to refer to and doesn't require excessive explanation about whether it is in state of Washington or what. For example consider usage in the disambiguation page Jefferson College as:
rather than:
which looks like a possible mistake, and versus
which is kind of extra redundant.
All that said, I don't care terribly much. But, why not keep it at (Washington, Mississippi)? doncram ( talk) 22:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
The article states: “Due to falling enrollment and financial difficulties associated with negative public attitudes towards the Vietnam War, the last classes were held in 1964.” Negative public attitudes toward the Vietnam War? In 1964? In Mississippi?
I find this explanation most unlikely. In 1964, a large scale anti-war sentiment was still in the future…and far away from Dixie. I suppose declining enrollment seems likely, though one wonders why. This was during the heigth of the baby boom generation for age-appropriate boys, and why would this particularly venerable Southern military academy fail while others survived even in the North? There was insufficient interest in the military academy located in the Deep South that Jefferson Davis graduated from?
As recently as 1958, the school’s cadets appeared in a memorable scene from the Civil War movie The Horse Soldiers in which there seemed to be no shortage of cadets, and I assume the older boys were excluded (those in the movie ranged from age nine to sixteen) due to the time period of the movie when the older cadets would have been off to war. (By the way, shouldn’t their appearance in the noted John Ford movie be mentioned in the article?):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZKxXNzjfPk
http://mmiarchivist.blogspot.com/2009/12/horse-soldiers-1959.html
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EAmjJVcxyFXHX0cjFIjsXw?feat=embedwebsite: HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 13:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Jefferson College (Mississippi). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)