![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Whole paragraphs taken from source:
http://www.anthroarcho.com/prehistory/warfare.html Kikuichimonji 03:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Where exactly is it? I cannot find reliable sources for accurate coordinates. ♆ CUSH ♆ 00:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I'd advocate for renaming this article "Jebel Sahaba" - that is how the site is generally referred to in both the popular media and in the archaeological literature these days, and I think anyone searching for this information on Wikipedia would be much more likely to search for Jebel Sahaba than they would Cemetery 117. We could always add a separate section for Tushka, or create a new page for that site. Thoughts? Ninafundisha ( talk) 05:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This may be journalistic clickbait. What we have so far is:
(emphasis mine). In other words, there is no positive evidence either way, and the journalists just thought this might make the story more sexy. Looking for the actual study now. Never cite journalism on academic studies, always use the journalists to find the studies, and then cite those. -- dab (𒁳) 07:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Found the actual study (Holliday 2015). As expected, the "race baiting" component was entirely the journalist's. -- dab (𒁳) 07:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Whole paragraphs taken from source:
http://www.anthroarcho.com/prehistory/warfare.html Kikuichimonji 03:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Where exactly is it? I cannot find reliable sources for accurate coordinates. ♆ CUSH ♆ 00:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I'd advocate for renaming this article "Jebel Sahaba" - that is how the site is generally referred to in both the popular media and in the archaeological literature these days, and I think anyone searching for this information on Wikipedia would be much more likely to search for Jebel Sahaba than they would Cemetery 117. We could always add a separate section for Tushka, or create a new page for that site. Thoughts? Ninafundisha ( talk) 05:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This may be journalistic clickbait. What we have so far is:
(emphasis mine). In other words, there is no positive evidence either way, and the journalists just thought this might make the story more sexy. Looking for the actual study now. Never cite journalism on academic studies, always use the journalists to find the studies, and then cite those. -- dab (𒁳) 07:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Found the actual study (Holliday 2015). As expected, the "race baiting" component was entirely the journalist's. -- dab (𒁳) 07:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)