![]() | Jean-Nicolas Corvisart was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 4, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Hi Aesisenstadt1, Ssimko1, and Mpatel58. Kennyling96, Samuelkou, and I (Brendanjhong) have talked with each other and have decided to collaborate and write about Corvisart for our assignment. We assigned Corvisart as our only topic, and I see that you three have assigned yourself to multiple topics. We were wondering if you still want to write about Corvisart. The three of us would like to start writing the article, and it would be convenient if we knew your status before we started. I think having six people on one article is a little overwhelming. Brendanjhong ( talk) 03:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Aeisenstadt1,
Ssimko1,
Samuelkou,
Mpatel58. Peer reviewers:
Emarti84.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
A well-structured article and clearly organized article. Made a few edits under "Biography," adding links to the wiki articles on significant terms and figures that were referred to. Prior to that there were no links. There is a lack of variety in sources in the "As Napoleon's Physician" section. I suggest backing up claims with more sources rather than repeatedly referencing a single source. There may be a slight confusion in the article as well. In "Biography," it is mentioned that Corvisart dies 4 months after Napoleon. In the following section, however, it is suggested that Corvisart dies before Napolean, and the quality of physician care following Corvisart changed: "Upon Corvisart's death and Napoleon's eventual decline in health, a marked difference was noted in efficacy of care and treatment style among the doctors who assumed the post as Napoleon's physicians." Please clarify this apparent contradiction. Also, consider removing the term "ironically" in the last sentence of the Biography section. This introduces an element of subjective evaluation on the author's part.
The last paragraph in the "Legacy" section lacks sources. Please add.
Overall, a thorough analysis and an informative read. Emarti84 ( talk) 22:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 12:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I propose to take on this review.
Wikipedia does not tolerate copyright violations. Please deal with these problems within the next seven days as I am minded to fail the nomination otherwise. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Jean-Nicolas Corvisart was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 4, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Hi Aesisenstadt1, Ssimko1, and Mpatel58. Kennyling96, Samuelkou, and I (Brendanjhong) have talked with each other and have decided to collaborate and write about Corvisart for our assignment. We assigned Corvisart as our only topic, and I see that you three have assigned yourself to multiple topics. We were wondering if you still want to write about Corvisart. The three of us would like to start writing the article, and it would be convenient if we knew your status before we started. I think having six people on one article is a little overwhelming. Brendanjhong ( talk) 03:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Aeisenstadt1,
Ssimko1,
Samuelkou,
Mpatel58. Peer reviewers:
Emarti84.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
A well-structured article and clearly organized article. Made a few edits under "Biography," adding links to the wiki articles on significant terms and figures that were referred to. Prior to that there were no links. There is a lack of variety in sources in the "As Napoleon's Physician" section. I suggest backing up claims with more sources rather than repeatedly referencing a single source. There may be a slight confusion in the article as well. In "Biography," it is mentioned that Corvisart dies 4 months after Napoleon. In the following section, however, it is suggested that Corvisart dies before Napolean, and the quality of physician care following Corvisart changed: "Upon Corvisart's death and Napoleon's eventual decline in health, a marked difference was noted in efficacy of care and treatment style among the doctors who assumed the post as Napoleon's physicians." Please clarify this apparent contradiction. Also, consider removing the term "ironically" in the last sentence of the Biography section. This introduces an element of subjective evaluation on the author's part.
The last paragraph in the "Legacy" section lacks sources. Please add.
Overall, a thorough analysis and an informative read. Emarti84 ( talk) 22:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 12:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I propose to take on this review.
Wikipedia does not tolerate copyright violations. Please deal with these problems within the next seven days as I am minded to fail the nomination otherwise. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)