Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 06:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Review in progress. Will get back to you tomorrow. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 06:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Alright, here I am. First off, I'm not sure that this person meets notability guidelines of WP:BIO. Specifically Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria states that
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, [1] and independent of the subject. [2]
- If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
- Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
All the bungie.net sources are primary (could be seen as self-published, but that's actually allowed for BLPs), so they don't count for notability, and Mr. Jones is not the subject of any other the other sources; he is simply mentioned in some of them (but not all). What are irrefutably notable are the games he worked on. You're going to need to find more independent secondary or tertiary sources that talk about Mr. Jones, not just to get this article to GA status, but to keep it out of AfD. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 07:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 06:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Review in progress. Will get back to you tomorrow. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 06:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Alright, here I am. First off, I'm not sure that this person meets notability guidelines of WP:BIO. Specifically Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria states that
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, [1] and independent of the subject. [2]
- If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
- Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
All the bungie.net sources are primary (could be seen as self-published, but that's actually allowed for BLPs), so they don't count for notability, and Mr. Jones is not the subject of any other the other sources; he is simply mentioned in some of them (but not all). What are irrefutably notable are the games he worked on. You're going to need to find more independent secondary or tertiary sources that talk about Mr. Jones, not just to get this article to GA status, but to keep it out of AfD. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 07:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)