From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit Request to add position as Specialty Chief Editor for Frontiers in Genetics

Please add the role for Roach of Specialty Chief Editor for the journal "Frontiers in Genetics: Human and Medical Genomics" starting in 2022.

Reference is here: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/sections/human-and-medical-genomics#about

This seems to be important to add, pursuant to

  • WP:NACADEMIC"The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area."

Jaredroach ( talk) 19:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC) reply

WP:NACADEMIC is how we help determine if someone is notable enough to have an article. It does not, in any way, affect what is WP:DUE inclusion. Only a survey of independent reliable secondary sources can help us determine what is and is not DUE. See also: WP:RSUW —  Shibbolethink ( ) 14:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Remove Autobiography template?

I think I've gotten this article much closer to NPOV, to the point where I would personally be comfortable removing the autobiography template. Anybody disagree? —  Shibbolethink ( ) 14:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Shibbolethink, I agree and will remove it. Thanks for your work. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 18:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit Request to add position as Specialty Chief Editor for Frontiers in Genetics

Please add the role for Roach of Specialty Chief Editor for the journal "Frontiers in Genetics: Human and Medical Genomics" starting in 2022.

Reference is here: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/sections/human-and-medical-genomics#about

This seems to be important to add, pursuant to

  • WP:NACADEMIC"The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area."

Jaredroach ( talk) 19:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC) reply

WP:NACADEMIC is how we help determine if someone is notable enough to have an article. It does not, in any way, affect what is WP:DUE inclusion. Only a survey of independent reliable secondary sources can help us determine what is and is not DUE. See also: WP:RSUW —  Shibbolethink ( ) 14:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Remove Autobiography template?

I think I've gotten this article much closer to NPOV, to the point where I would personally be comfortable removing the autobiography template. Anybody disagree? —  Shibbolethink ( ) 14:58, 5 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Shibbolethink, I agree and will remove it. Thanks for your work. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 18:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook