![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Stalin is neither a historian nor a linguist, which BTW he even says himself. For this alone, it's not relevant to a linguistic theory, it it relevant to the Nikolay Yakovlevich Marr article.
Furthermore, and even more importantly, in the entire, rather long text, the Japhetic isn't addressed. You won't find the name mentioned nor any language or language group.
Pjacobi 12:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I've just removed a box claiming this as part of WikiProject Physics. I have no idea what it was doing there. -- 86.128.137.136 17:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Among western linguists, Marr is most famous for his claim that all languages are derived from the syllables sal, ber, yon, and rosh. Is this part of the Japhetic theory? AnonMoos ( talk) 11:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
If the people who wrote this stuff opposing Marr are such great scholars, why does the article suck so bad? Have some professional pride. 2607:FB90:9C2C:C0DE:B1C9:490D:F3BD:9FA5 ( talk) 03:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Stalin is neither a historian nor a linguist, which BTW he even says himself. For this alone, it's not relevant to a linguistic theory, it it relevant to the Nikolay Yakovlevich Marr article.
Furthermore, and even more importantly, in the entire, rather long text, the Japhetic isn't addressed. You won't find the name mentioned nor any language or language group.
Pjacobi 12:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I've just removed a box claiming this as part of WikiProject Physics. I have no idea what it was doing there. -- 86.128.137.136 17:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Among western linguists, Marr is most famous for his claim that all languages are derived from the syllables sal, ber, yon, and rosh. Is this part of the Japhetic theory? AnonMoos ( talk) 11:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
If the people who wrote this stuff opposing Marr are such great scholars, why does the article suck so bad? Have some professional pride. 2607:FB90:9C2C:C0DE:B1C9:490D:F3BD:9FA5 ( talk) 03:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)