Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Djmaschek ( talk · contribs) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Initial review

After a quick read, the article looks good. A more thorough review will follow shortly. Djmaschek ( talk) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Review 1

GA class = Passed. After writing up the review, I decided to make the changes listed in the last 3 bullet points because they were so minor. Djmaschek ( talk) 02:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Well-written.  Done But please see my notes below.
• Verifiable.  Done
• Broad coverage.  Done
• Neutral.  Done
• Stable.  Done
• Illustrated.  Done
• Specs in text match those in infobox.  Done
• Construction and career, paragraph 3: This is written correctly. However, when I read it, I was confused by the fact that TA-4 went first followed by TA-3. So, I had to reread it carefully. My suggestion is to change "the troop ships" to "the TA-4 troop ships". This should clear up any confusion in readers like me.
• Construction and career, paragraph 4, sentences 6, 7 & 8: The tense suddenly changes from past to present tense. There are 3 words "is" that need to be changed to "was" and one "are" that needs to be changed to "were". (convoy is; are sunk; is badly; Take is not.)
• Construction and career, paragraph 5: USS Cooper needs a hyperlink.