GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 22:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
After making a handful of grammatical corrections or adjustments, I feel the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and structure.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article has a healthy quantity of reliable sources listed in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and shows no traces of original research.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic, in a balanced fashion.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article's tone is free of bias.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article has not suffered disruptive editing for at least a year and a few months.
"Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (
talk)
01:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
All images used are public domain, and also relevant to the article's topic.
"Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (
talk)
01:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I feel the article satisfies the GA criteria, as per the results of this review. Congratulations!
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 22:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
After making a handful of grammatical corrections or adjustments, I feel the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and structure.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article has a healthy quantity of reliable sources listed in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and shows no traces of original research.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic, in a balanced fashion.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article's tone is free of bias.
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
The article has not suffered disruptive editing for at least a year and a few months.
"Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (
talk)
01:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
All images used are public domain, and also relevant to the article's topic.
"Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (
talk)
01:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I feel the article satisfies the GA criteria, as per the results of this review. Congratulations!
"A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (
talk)
04:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)