A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on November 7, 2016. | |
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on March 11, 2012, March 11, 2017, March 11, 2018, March 11, 2020, and March 11, 2024. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Didn't she also roll up a lot of terrorist cells, put away the bad guys, prevent attacks?"
What's THIS doing in here?
People who followed Reno at the time, talked often of her canoeing and kayaking. She used at first a pokeboat. Surprised this is not listed as it felt like a part of her character at the time she was in office. Here is a Post article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/2001/04/08/rolling-on-the-river/038d6bc2-5b34-4ea5-8e39-4e3fb63770b5/ One of several that discuss her past time. Can someone who knows more add it? 2601:645:201:BF71:8065:9700:BAB1:B560 ( talk) 18:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
24.250.246.178rhesusman Jan 24, 2005 2:43 UTC
Amcbride had deleted a link and stated the reason as being"one person's personal website isn't enough basis to include this criticism".
Everything stated in the Witch Hunt information page is based on fact. It is very relevent to the article regarding Reno's history as an attorney.
I would also point out to other incidents of Reno being involved in similar witch hunts:
http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witchhunt/ccla/pages/fijnje.htm - Bobby Fijnje, a 14 year-old boy who was a victim of a wrongful prosecution at the hands of Ms Reno and her gang.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/terror/cases/fijnje.html PBS description of the same case.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/734855/posts Free Republic article.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Piercetp ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for your response.
I have been looking for more articles and came across this article.
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/1993-03-03/news/feature.html
I can find others but hopefully this is a good start.
I'm removing a few of the points in the "controversies" section. In Biographies of living persons, it is especially important to have in-line citations for things that are perceived as negative. (Also, before adding these back with citations, please be sure that the citations show not simply that the point is true, but that they were actually controversial in a notable way.) -- Allen 02:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
To read the original entry, you'd think that the only thing that had happened with the justice dept from 1992-2000 was waco, the brnach davidians, and elian gonzalez. Added other major justice dept cases under reno. I'm sure there are a bunch of others I've forgotten - in today's climate, I tend to think of all the terrorism cases, but that's hardly the only thing that was going on in the doj + fbi during this time - please add more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.125.97 ( talk • contribs)
Shouldn't there be some information on her well-known video-game hate? I don't know nearly enough about it to add anything, but I think it should be in the article, as it's a prominent fact about her. (In fact, it's why I came to the article!) aubrey 10:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Reno does not belong in the category "District Attorneys" because she was never in a District Attorney's office. She was State's Attorney and Attorney General, not a District Attorney. Therefore she does belong in the category "Prosecutors".
In the state of Florida, there are no District Attorneys. The local prosecutors (AKA District Attorneys in other states & jurisdictions) are called State Attorneys. Specifically, Janet Reno was the State Attorney for the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida ---Miami-Dade County--then called Dade County. There are 20 elected State Attorneys in Florida. The 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida is the largest prosecutors office in the state. People often confuse the terminology because Florida also has the elected office of Florida Attorney General which handles legal matters at a different level of the legal system--criminal appeals for example. The newly elected governor of Florida, Charlie Crist was the former Attorney General.
So to correct the discussion error, Janet Reno WAS the District Attorney for Dade County but was never titled as the District Attorney.
There is no mention of Reno's citing for contempt of congress in this article, which occurred sometime around August 1998. She refused to turn over two subpoenaed Justice department memos related to fund-raising abuses in the 1996 presidential campaign. Is this a significant enough event that it should be added to her article? To this date, there have been only 10 Cabinet-level or senior executive officials cited for contempt of the American congress (Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Commerce Secretary Rogers C. B. Morton in 1975; Health, Education and Welfare Secretary Joseph A. Califano Jr. in 1978; Energy Secretary Charles Duncan in 1980; Energy Secretary James B. Edwards in 1981; Interior Secretary James Watt in 1982; Anne Gorsuch Burford and Attorney General William French Smith in 1983; White House Counsel John M. Quinn in 1996; and Attorney General Janet Reno in 1998.... Attorney General Alberto Gonzales might make the 11th this year). -- RootsLINUX 07:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Maybe add Shaw v. Reno? She did play a role in sending the district back to North Carolina for reevaluation, and thus created the weirdly shaped district that resulted in 5 citizens suing.
Image:Waco4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is this article semi protected? I see no evidence of persistent vandalism or edit warring. Also the last edit before mine was done on January 8th. I added semi protect icon for clarification. миражinred ( speak, my child...) 16:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't think the epithet can be ignored entirely: it's definitely out there, and used by some WP-notable commentators like Geoff Metcalf. However, the article needs to make it clear that it's by no means a mainstream or widely-held opinion. I've tried to strike a compromise between the two sides in the recent edit war. If subsequent consensus emerges here for removal of any mention the nickname, that's fine with me too. Hqb ( talk) 20:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion, no one has given any reason to overrule WP:BLP, do no harm, as such, until someone has a good reason to place it back into the article, I am removing it from the article. Jons63 ( talk) 21:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Is this really necessary to the article? I would think not, but I didn't want to edit it without somebody else's opinion. Inks.LWC ( talk) 06:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Recent attorneys general seem to have a lot of controversy around them as far as how they interpret the constitution and their ability to uphold the law aside from their personal beliefs, from subjects as broad as abortion to civil liberties. Were there just no issues such as this surrounding Reno? I would like to see more in the article about her style, controversial or not, about how she shaped the justice department and what laws she chose to lean on or be lenient on, not just who was captured during her tenure. 75.55.37.77 ( talk) 20:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Sandy
Is is true that Bill Clinton said Reno was his biggest mistake? [1]
That's the only site that I can find it on and not a very reliable source, really. Moderate2008 ( talk) 01:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
It says she was nominated in 1993 by president barack obama :|
Obviously incorrect, however i don't know enough about american politics to fix it so... heads up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.193.94 ( talk) 18:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Reno began her job as AG March 12 1993, I believe. Can anyone reputably cite exact date? Mydogtrouble ( talk) 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
She had a substantial "guest" role in season 1, played by Linda Gehringer in 2 episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.252.163.190 ( talk) 01:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
She also appeared as guest (voice) in The Simpsons season 24 episode 16 "Dark Knight Court". Maybe this could be added to the pop culture section. 67.188.178.2 ( talk) 04:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Why no mention of this? It's hardly a secret and if she's been cured or just survived a long time with it, either way noteworthy and certainly source-able. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 15:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is a close to neutral as (fill in metaphor, there are too many for Janet Reno). :- ) DCS 07:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that a comparatively large portion of this article is sourced to a single St. Petersburg Times editorial opposing Reno's run for governor (provocatively entitled "Reno owes the public answers".) Obviously, it would be better to replace that with a more neutral source wherever possible, and to avoid citing it except when it's being used to illustrate an opinion... wouldn't it? It's currently quoted at length in parts of the article that don't seem to be treating it as an opinion. -- Aquillion ( talk) 05:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
While Clinton could steer a middle ground between his Democratic supporters and the Republican Congress on monetary issues, Reno's job was at the center of a variety of intractable cultural conflicts. This made her a lightning rod for criticism of the Clinton Administration from activists, [who?] who often denounced the federal government as a threat to their fundamental freedoms. [citation needed]
In 1994, Reno signed the "Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending" that was entered into the Federal Register on April 15. The statement states: "The relief sought by DOJ in lending discrimination lawsuits may include: Changes in loan processing and underwriting procedures (including second reviews of denied applications) to ensure equal treatment without regard to prohibited factors."[1] MurielMary ( talk) 11:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Given the length of Reno's tenure as Attorney General, I think this article can use some expansion. If anyone would like to discuss ideas for how to improve this article, I'd be happy to collaborate. This article from CNN detailing some major events of Reno's career and this Time article could be useful sources moving forward. Knope7 ( talk) 03:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Janet Reno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The lede should cover her actions as AG
An editor removed this paragraph from the lede:
The argument for removing it was "The article covers this later on. The documents were turned over and the full House did not cite her for contempt. It's significant enough for the article but unnecessary for the lead." However, this is the issue that's covered at too small of a length in the body of his Wikipedia article, and clearly is a topic that defines her life and career. The citations for this are included in my original edit. At the very least, it's absurd that the AG only ONE sentence in her entire page mentioning her contempt citation. Can I get someone with consensus to agree with me that my paragraph should be in the lead somewhere. Thanks! Kozak4512 ( talk) 03:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Another point that I feels needs to be made: this article has been on wikipedia for well more than a decade. Suddenly, in May of 2019, we urgently need to point out in the lede that she was held in contempt by congress. Why? Well, that's pretty obvious, it's because the current AG has been cited for contempt in the last few days. But that has zero bearing on this article, which has been edited by hundreds of wikipedians over the years, who did not feel that this was notable enough for inclusion in the lede. We don't start revising history simply because of current events, when those events are not specifically and directly related to _this particular person's BLP_. So, I'm going to go with a strong oppose to this instance of 'recentism' being used as justification for making notable that which nobody felt was defining over the last decade plus. Anastrophe ( talk)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"The following month, Starr received permission from Reno to expand his probe turned his probe into conduct related to..."
Bad grammar. It should likely say "...from Reno to redirect his probe into conduct related to..." Pmneeley ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
In the "In Pop Culture" section of the page, Wiki should include a mention of Janet Reno as the main topic of one of Awkwafina's songs "Jane Reno Mad". The citation should be from https://news.avclub.com/janet-reno-s-pop-culture-moments-are-inextricable-from-1798254057 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udonnoods ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on November 7, 2016. | |
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on March 11, 2012, March 11, 2017, March 11, 2018, March 11, 2020, and March 11, 2024. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Didn't she also roll up a lot of terrorist cells, put away the bad guys, prevent attacks?"
What's THIS doing in here?
People who followed Reno at the time, talked often of her canoeing and kayaking. She used at first a pokeboat. Surprised this is not listed as it felt like a part of her character at the time she was in office. Here is a Post article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/2001/04/08/rolling-on-the-river/038d6bc2-5b34-4ea5-8e39-4e3fb63770b5/ One of several that discuss her past time. Can someone who knows more add it? 2601:645:201:BF71:8065:9700:BAB1:B560 ( talk) 18:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
24.250.246.178rhesusman Jan 24, 2005 2:43 UTC
Amcbride had deleted a link and stated the reason as being"one person's personal website isn't enough basis to include this criticism".
Everything stated in the Witch Hunt information page is based on fact. It is very relevent to the article regarding Reno's history as an attorney.
I would also point out to other incidents of Reno being involved in similar witch hunts:
http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witchhunt/ccla/pages/fijnje.htm - Bobby Fijnje, a 14 year-old boy who was a victim of a wrongful prosecution at the hands of Ms Reno and her gang.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/terror/cases/fijnje.html PBS description of the same case.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/734855/posts Free Republic article.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Piercetp ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for your response.
I have been looking for more articles and came across this article.
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/1993-03-03/news/feature.html
I can find others but hopefully this is a good start.
I'm removing a few of the points in the "controversies" section. In Biographies of living persons, it is especially important to have in-line citations for things that are perceived as negative. (Also, before adding these back with citations, please be sure that the citations show not simply that the point is true, but that they were actually controversial in a notable way.) -- Allen 02:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
To read the original entry, you'd think that the only thing that had happened with the justice dept from 1992-2000 was waco, the brnach davidians, and elian gonzalez. Added other major justice dept cases under reno. I'm sure there are a bunch of others I've forgotten - in today's climate, I tend to think of all the terrorism cases, but that's hardly the only thing that was going on in the doj + fbi during this time - please add more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.125.97 ( talk • contribs)
Shouldn't there be some information on her well-known video-game hate? I don't know nearly enough about it to add anything, but I think it should be in the article, as it's a prominent fact about her. (In fact, it's why I came to the article!) aubrey 10:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Reno does not belong in the category "District Attorneys" because she was never in a District Attorney's office. She was State's Attorney and Attorney General, not a District Attorney. Therefore she does belong in the category "Prosecutors".
In the state of Florida, there are no District Attorneys. The local prosecutors (AKA District Attorneys in other states & jurisdictions) are called State Attorneys. Specifically, Janet Reno was the State Attorney for the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida ---Miami-Dade County--then called Dade County. There are 20 elected State Attorneys in Florida. The 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida is the largest prosecutors office in the state. People often confuse the terminology because Florida also has the elected office of Florida Attorney General which handles legal matters at a different level of the legal system--criminal appeals for example. The newly elected governor of Florida, Charlie Crist was the former Attorney General.
So to correct the discussion error, Janet Reno WAS the District Attorney for Dade County but was never titled as the District Attorney.
There is no mention of Reno's citing for contempt of congress in this article, which occurred sometime around August 1998. She refused to turn over two subpoenaed Justice department memos related to fund-raising abuses in the 1996 presidential campaign. Is this a significant enough event that it should be added to her article? To this date, there have been only 10 Cabinet-level or senior executive officials cited for contempt of the American congress (Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Commerce Secretary Rogers C. B. Morton in 1975; Health, Education and Welfare Secretary Joseph A. Califano Jr. in 1978; Energy Secretary Charles Duncan in 1980; Energy Secretary James B. Edwards in 1981; Interior Secretary James Watt in 1982; Anne Gorsuch Burford and Attorney General William French Smith in 1983; White House Counsel John M. Quinn in 1996; and Attorney General Janet Reno in 1998.... Attorney General Alberto Gonzales might make the 11th this year). -- RootsLINUX 07:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Maybe add Shaw v. Reno? She did play a role in sending the district back to North Carolina for reevaluation, and thus created the weirdly shaped district that resulted in 5 citizens suing.
Image:Waco4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Why is this article semi protected? I see no evidence of persistent vandalism or edit warring. Also the last edit before mine was done on January 8th. I added semi protect icon for clarification. миражinred ( speak, my child...) 16:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't think the epithet can be ignored entirely: it's definitely out there, and used by some WP-notable commentators like Geoff Metcalf. However, the article needs to make it clear that it's by no means a mainstream or widely-held opinion. I've tried to strike a compromise between the two sides in the recent edit war. If subsequent consensus emerges here for removal of any mention the nickname, that's fine with me too. Hqb ( talk) 20:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion, no one has given any reason to overrule WP:BLP, do no harm, as such, until someone has a good reason to place it back into the article, I am removing it from the article. Jons63 ( talk) 21:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Is this really necessary to the article? I would think not, but I didn't want to edit it without somebody else's opinion. Inks.LWC ( talk) 06:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Recent attorneys general seem to have a lot of controversy around them as far as how they interpret the constitution and their ability to uphold the law aside from their personal beliefs, from subjects as broad as abortion to civil liberties. Were there just no issues such as this surrounding Reno? I would like to see more in the article about her style, controversial or not, about how she shaped the justice department and what laws she chose to lean on or be lenient on, not just who was captured during her tenure. 75.55.37.77 ( talk) 20:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Sandy
Is is true that Bill Clinton said Reno was his biggest mistake? [1]
That's the only site that I can find it on and not a very reliable source, really. Moderate2008 ( talk) 01:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
It says she was nominated in 1993 by president barack obama :|
Obviously incorrect, however i don't know enough about american politics to fix it so... heads up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.193.94 ( talk) 18:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Reno began her job as AG March 12 1993, I believe. Can anyone reputably cite exact date? Mydogtrouble ( talk) 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
She had a substantial "guest" role in season 1, played by Linda Gehringer in 2 episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.252.163.190 ( talk) 01:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
She also appeared as guest (voice) in The Simpsons season 24 episode 16 "Dark Knight Court". Maybe this could be added to the pop culture section. 67.188.178.2 ( talk) 04:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Why no mention of this? It's hardly a secret and if she's been cured or just survived a long time with it, either way noteworthy and certainly source-able. 72.228.177.92 ( talk) 15:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This article is a close to neutral as (fill in metaphor, there are too many for Janet Reno). :- ) DCS 07:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that a comparatively large portion of this article is sourced to a single St. Petersburg Times editorial opposing Reno's run for governor (provocatively entitled "Reno owes the public answers".) Obviously, it would be better to replace that with a more neutral source wherever possible, and to avoid citing it except when it's being used to illustrate an opinion... wouldn't it? It's currently quoted at length in parts of the article that don't seem to be treating it as an opinion. -- Aquillion ( talk) 05:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
While Clinton could steer a middle ground between his Democratic supporters and the Republican Congress on monetary issues, Reno's job was at the center of a variety of intractable cultural conflicts. This made her a lightning rod for criticism of the Clinton Administration from activists, [who?] who often denounced the federal government as a threat to their fundamental freedoms. [citation needed]
In 1994, Reno signed the "Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending" that was entered into the Federal Register on April 15. The statement states: "The relief sought by DOJ in lending discrimination lawsuits may include: Changes in loan processing and underwriting procedures (including second reviews of denied applications) to ensure equal treatment without regard to prohibited factors."[1] MurielMary ( talk) 11:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Given the length of Reno's tenure as Attorney General, I think this article can use some expansion. If anyone would like to discuss ideas for how to improve this article, I'd be happy to collaborate. This article from CNN detailing some major events of Reno's career and this Time article could be useful sources moving forward. Knope7 ( talk) 03:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Janet Reno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The lede should cover her actions as AG
An editor removed this paragraph from the lede:
The argument for removing it was "The article covers this later on. The documents were turned over and the full House did not cite her for contempt. It's significant enough for the article but unnecessary for the lead." However, this is the issue that's covered at too small of a length in the body of his Wikipedia article, and clearly is a topic that defines her life and career. The citations for this are included in my original edit. At the very least, it's absurd that the AG only ONE sentence in her entire page mentioning her contempt citation. Can I get someone with consensus to agree with me that my paragraph should be in the lead somewhere. Thanks! Kozak4512 ( talk) 03:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Another point that I feels needs to be made: this article has been on wikipedia for well more than a decade. Suddenly, in May of 2019, we urgently need to point out in the lede that she was held in contempt by congress. Why? Well, that's pretty obvious, it's because the current AG has been cited for contempt in the last few days. But that has zero bearing on this article, which has been edited by hundreds of wikipedians over the years, who did not feel that this was notable enough for inclusion in the lede. We don't start revising history simply because of current events, when those events are not specifically and directly related to _this particular person's BLP_. So, I'm going to go with a strong oppose to this instance of 'recentism' being used as justification for making notable that which nobody felt was defining over the last decade plus. Anastrophe ( talk)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"The following month, Starr received permission from Reno to expand his probe turned his probe into conduct related to..."
Bad grammar. It should likely say "...from Reno to redirect his probe into conduct related to..." Pmneeley ( talk) 08:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
In the "In Pop Culture" section of the page, Wiki should include a mention of Janet Reno as the main topic of one of Awkwafina's songs "Jane Reno Mad". The citation should be from https://news.avclub.com/janet-reno-s-pop-culture-moments-are-inextricable-from-1798254057 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udonnoods ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)