This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Janet Mitchell (EastEnders) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should this page be merged to a list? GunGagdin Moan 17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Is it right that the actor portraying this character is just known as "Grace" with no surname? If not, it needs correcting. If so, I'd be interested to if the BBC has ever given a reason for this, and possibly even add that to the article. It's out of line with other babies that have been credited in the show. Dybeck ( talk) 16:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Just wondered if it would be possible to get a more up to date picture for Janet. Maybe she's been too far away from the camera recently, I don't know. – Anemone Projectors– 14:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Somebody keeps editing the page to say that Janet's last appearance was on 17 July 2012 and that she is a past character, but there has been no evidence stating she has left! Anemone so kindly reverted back to the previous revision, but it was then reedited by the same user to state the same thing and a message was included to say that if Anemone reverted the edit again, the user would kill him! Surely this must be against rules?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.153.116 ( talk) 17:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, 94.2.153.116, this is against rules. I will ask Anemone Projectors to ban this user as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.153.116 ( talk) 10:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
No, it was two different people. I didn't do the edit, nor did I answer myself. 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 15:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Me and Tina are two different people! The ideas some people have in their heads... 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 20:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Plus, Tina hasn't made any edits since Tuesday... You're BAZINGA if you think that! 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 20:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
You can't say she's a menace to Wikipedia! She's made some really good contributions. 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 18:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
I never said that Mark Fowler was never recast to Todd Carty. See, accusing me of stuff I didn't even do. And just to clear things up, I am not the same person as 94.2.117.205. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 16:42, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
And anyway, 94.2.117.205 is crazy! He vandalises much more than me. OK, sometimes I do edits I shouldn't do. But I have made some good noteworthy contributions to soap articles. Now, 94.2.117.205 is a different story. He never makes good edits, only vandalises and causes disruption. So if anything, it should be him/her who gets blamed, not me. I am also not a sock of User:Sheep2009, or User:Trueman31, and I am not afraid to stand up for myself! Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 17:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I didn't invent them, I looked on Google and that's how many results Abi Cross and Pauline Macer actually had. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 09:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Here are the relevant search results (without including EastEnders):
Including EastEnders:
... so I'm not sure what you're Googling, Tina... Stephenb (Talk) 11:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I didn't make it up, so I must have done it wrong. Sorry about that. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 14:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that, Anemone. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 14:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Following the one year rule, she should now be counted as a past character as it's a year tomorrow since she last appeared, plus she's not credited in any upcoming episodes. Discuss? Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 21:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Bleaney! Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 13:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Should this article be added into the list? Nothing seems to be happening here. If it was any other article it would have been put into a list years ago. Rain the 1 23:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey hey guys! Don't be like that! George Sorby 21:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Grace is credited just as Grace, please don't change that (she is a minor, this is actually rather important to her family). Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Why does Janet's duration show as 2006-08, 2010-2012, when Janet appeared in 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.100.198 ( talk) 17:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Given that the character turns 18 this year - and that by definition, Grace must be the same age or older - is it still applicable to describe Grace as a "child actress"? I know strictly speaking she won't be an adult until the day she turns 18, but I don't see the designation of "child actress" on similar pages (e.g. Emmerdale's Amelia Flannagan, who is only 15). To me, the team would denote a small child. Surely at nearly 18, she's just an actress? SpamFritterBitter ( talk) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Janet Mitchell (EastEnders) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should this page be merged to a list? GunGagdin Moan 17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Is it right that the actor portraying this character is just known as "Grace" with no surname? If not, it needs correcting. If so, I'd be interested to if the BBC has ever given a reason for this, and possibly even add that to the article. It's out of line with other babies that have been credited in the show. Dybeck ( talk) 16:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Just wondered if it would be possible to get a more up to date picture for Janet. Maybe she's been too far away from the camera recently, I don't know. – Anemone Projectors– 14:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Somebody keeps editing the page to say that Janet's last appearance was on 17 July 2012 and that she is a past character, but there has been no evidence stating she has left! Anemone so kindly reverted back to the previous revision, but it was then reedited by the same user to state the same thing and a message was included to say that if Anemone reverted the edit again, the user would kill him! Surely this must be against rules?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.153.116 ( talk) 17:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Yes, 94.2.153.116, this is against rules. I will ask Anemone Projectors to ban this user as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.153.116 ( talk) 10:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
No, it was two different people. I didn't do the edit, nor did I answer myself. 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 15:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Me and Tina are two different people! The ideas some people have in their heads... 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 20:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Plus, Tina hasn't made any edits since Tuesday... You're BAZINGA if you think that! 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 20:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
You can't say she's a menace to Wikipedia! She's made some really good contributions. 94.2.117.205 ( talk) 18:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
I never said that Mark Fowler was never recast to Todd Carty. See, accusing me of stuff I didn't even do. And just to clear things up, I am not the same person as 94.2.117.205. Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 16:42, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
And anyway, 94.2.117.205 is crazy! He vandalises much more than me. OK, sometimes I do edits I shouldn't do. But I have made some good noteworthy contributions to soap articles. Now, 94.2.117.205 is a different story. He never makes good edits, only vandalises and causes disruption. So if anything, it should be him/her who gets blamed, not me. I am also not a sock of User:Sheep2009, or User:Trueman31, and I am not afraid to stand up for myself! Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 17:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I didn't invent them, I looked on Google and that's how many results Abi Cross and Pauline Macer actually had. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 09:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Here are the relevant search results (without including EastEnders):
Including EastEnders:
... so I'm not sure what you're Googling, Tina... Stephenb (Talk) 11:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I didn't make it up, so I must have done it wrong. Sorry about that. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 14:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that, Anemone. Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 14:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Following the one year rule, she should now be counted as a past character as it's a year tomorrow since she last appeared, plus she's not credited in any upcoming episodes. Discuss? Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 21:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Bleaney! Tinamckintyre23 ( talk) 13:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Should this article be added into the list? Nothing seems to be happening here. If it was any other article it would have been put into a list years ago. Rain the 1 23:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey hey guys! Don't be like that! George Sorby 21:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Grace is credited just as Grace, please don't change that (she is a minor, this is actually rather important to her family). Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Why does Janet's duration show as 2006-08, 2010-2012, when Janet appeared in 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.100.198 ( talk) 17:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Given that the character turns 18 this year - and that by definition, Grace must be the same age or older - is it still applicable to describe Grace as a "child actress"? I know strictly speaking she won't be an adult until the day she turns 18, but I don't see the designation of "child actress" on similar pages (e.g. Emmerdale's Amelia Flannagan, who is only 15). To me, the team would denote a small child. Surely at nearly 18, she's just an actress? SpamFritterBitter ( talk) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)