This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recently added:
The preceding paragraph says that not he but his work had been discovered. The context makes it pretty clear that this means discovered by those who, deservedly or otherwise, are the arbiters of opinion in the particular field. It makes sense to say that his work was discovered via an exhibition, and this source (for what it's worth) backs up this claim.
I can imagine that the lack of any contribution from Black scholars might have reduced the value of the exhibition. But where is the evidence for such a claim? -- Hoary ( talk) 08:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Van Der Zee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
We should change the lead image to this. The current image was taken less than a year prior to his death and is copyrighted and blurry. My proposal is an image of him during the prime of his life, the copyright has expired, and it’s a self portrait, so it’s a more accurate representation of him and his photographic style. Thoughts? The Image Editor ( talk) 16:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recently added:
The preceding paragraph says that not he but his work had been discovered. The context makes it pretty clear that this means discovered by those who, deservedly or otherwise, are the arbiters of opinion in the particular field. It makes sense to say that his work was discovered via an exhibition, and this source (for what it's worth) backs up this claim.
I can imagine that the lack of any contribution from Black scholars might have reduced the value of the exhibition. But where is the evidence for such a claim? -- Hoary ( talk) 08:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Van Der Zee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
We should change the lead image to this. The current image was taken less than a year prior to his death and is copyrighted and blurry. My proposal is an image of him during the prime of his life, the copyright has expired, and it’s a self portrait, so it’s a more accurate representation of him and his photographic style. Thoughts? The Image Editor ( talk) 16:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)