GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jebus989 ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 19:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm happy to take this review. I've given the article a preliminary going over and will provide comments shortly. Jebus989 ✰ 19:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments Overall, this article will need a lot of work to bring to GA standards. Referencing is the primary concern but the overall organisation could also be improved, as could the weighting of certain sections.
Specifics:
There are other issues, mostly lack of references, but I will continue if/when points begin to be addressed. As more general commentary, I think the article is generally well-written, and handles difficult sections without bias. However, similarly to the Crick GA assessment, it is a solid B-class, but some way off a GA at the moment. Jebus989 ✰ 20:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Due to the serious lack of references and other issues above, I have failed this nomination and the article will not be promoted to GA at this time Jebus989 ✰ 11:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Being a Wikipedia editor does not give you the right to vandalise the FRANCIS CRICK and JAMES WATSON articles; the late Rosalind Franklin was not a co-discoverer of the structure of DNA. Please desist P.Schrey!
Martin Packer, U.K. Researcher for "Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets" by Professor Robert Olby — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.32.42 ( talk) 09:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
The reverted edit was not vandalism but was not supported by the reference. The Nobel Prize citation in the article does not mention Franklin. Editor Schrey, if you think her role is being slighted, please provide reliable sources to back up edits. In the meantime, the James_D._Watson#Use_of_King.27s_College_results section covers the controversy quite well. -- Javaweb ( talk) 15:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Javaweb
For the record ROSALIND FRANKLIN had no involvement in the "discovery of DNA" either; the structure of DNA was elucidated by JAMES WATSON and FRANCIS CRICK. No other editor will be able to prove otherwise. The suggestion that ROSALIND FRANKLIN was involved is not supported by the facts. M.D.P.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jebus989 ( talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 19:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm happy to take this review. I've given the article a preliminary going over and will provide comments shortly. Jebus989 ✰ 19:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Comments Overall, this article will need a lot of work to bring to GA standards. Referencing is the primary concern but the overall organisation could also be improved, as could the weighting of certain sections.
Specifics:
There are other issues, mostly lack of references, but I will continue if/when points begin to be addressed. As more general commentary, I think the article is generally well-written, and handles difficult sections without bias. However, similarly to the Crick GA assessment, it is a solid B-class, but some way off a GA at the moment. Jebus989 ✰ 20:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Due to the serious lack of references and other issues above, I have failed this nomination and the article will not be promoted to GA at this time Jebus989 ✰ 11:41, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Being a Wikipedia editor does not give you the right to vandalise the FRANCIS CRICK and JAMES WATSON articles; the late Rosalind Franklin was not a co-discoverer of the structure of DNA. Please desist P.Schrey!
Martin Packer, U.K. Researcher for "Francis Crick: Hunter of Life's Secrets" by Professor Robert Olby — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.32.42 ( talk) 09:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
The reverted edit was not vandalism but was not supported by the reference. The Nobel Prize citation in the article does not mention Franklin. Editor Schrey, if you think her role is being slighted, please provide reliable sources to back up edits. In the meantime, the James_D._Watson#Use_of_King.27s_College_results section covers the controversy quite well. -- Javaweb ( talk) 15:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Javaweb
For the record ROSALIND FRANKLIN had no involvement in the "discovery of DNA" either; the structure of DNA was elucidated by JAMES WATSON and FRANCIS CRICK. No other editor will be able to prove otherwise. The suggestion that ROSALIND FRANKLIN was involved is not supported by the facts. M.D.P.