![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Per the request for assessment on WikiProject India. The article has been assessed as B class:
Otherwise, well written. Referencing and expansion are the main points to see about here. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 05:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This article seems to seriously violate Wikipedia's principle of neutral point of view several times. Specifically, it refers to emperor Aurangzeb as "bigoted" and also refers to the capture of prince Dara Shikoh as having been committed "treacherously". The article also only cites historical sources from the early twentieth century. Newer authorship would almost certainly be helpful in providing a more balanced interpretation and presentation of the events and individuals discussed in this article. Derek Tank ( talk) 04:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello,@ Kautilya3:, I wrote a proper researched lines about Jai Singh I. It is not over detail but very important to understand the campaign of Jai Singh in Deccan (1665).The details are actually just a overview of the topic for readers, who wants to know this episode of Maratha, Amber history. Every one knows, those are student of history that Jai Singh has title of Mirza Rajah given by Shaha Jahan, so you don't need to remove it. Jadunath sarkar was a respected historian and wrote this. After research fory Parisian, English factory record, Marathi Bakhar, Portuguese documents. If you are satisfied, I want to revert my edits. If you want to change or suggest something, your welcome, thankyou. Education is strength ( talk) 04:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:, I am using Sarkar's source with carefully. Sarkar cross-checked lost of Parisian, EFR of Surat, Sabasad Bakhar and then wrote the book. I can't fully believe contemporary documents of 17th century and I don't have access to it. But the info I wrote is very important and I cross-checked it with writers like Grant Duff and its true. I suggest to restore my edits. The date of Mirza death is also wrong here and without any source. I add date with source. If you want something to change disscus here, don't directly remove info. I have citations, as I read Wikipedia allows published source for citation. Education is strength ( talk) 09:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Per the request for assessment on WikiProject India. The article has been assessed as B class:
Otherwise, well written. Referencing and expansion are the main points to see about here. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 05:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Note: {{ WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
This article seems to seriously violate Wikipedia's principle of neutral point of view several times. Specifically, it refers to emperor Aurangzeb as "bigoted" and also refers to the capture of prince Dara Shikoh as having been committed "treacherously". The article also only cites historical sources from the early twentieth century. Newer authorship would almost certainly be helpful in providing a more balanced interpretation and presentation of the events and individuals discussed in this article. Derek Tank ( talk) 04:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello,@ Kautilya3:, I wrote a proper researched lines about Jai Singh I. It is not over detail but very important to understand the campaign of Jai Singh in Deccan (1665).The details are actually just a overview of the topic for readers, who wants to know this episode of Maratha, Amber history. Every one knows, those are student of history that Jai Singh has title of Mirza Rajah given by Shaha Jahan, so you don't need to remove it. Jadunath sarkar was a respected historian and wrote this. After research fory Parisian, English factory record, Marathi Bakhar, Portuguese documents. If you are satisfied, I want to revert my edits. If you want to change or suggest something, your welcome, thankyou. Education is strength ( talk) 04:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
@ Kautilya3:, I am using Sarkar's source with carefully. Sarkar cross-checked lost of Parisian, EFR of Surat, Sabasad Bakhar and then wrote the book. I can't fully believe contemporary documents of 17th century and I don't have access to it. But the info I wrote is very important and I cross-checked it with writers like Grant Duff and its true. I suggest to restore my edits. The date of Mirza death is also wrong here and without any source. I add date with source. If you want something to change disscus here, don't directly remove info. I have citations, as I read Wikipedia allows published source for citation. Education is strength ( talk) 09:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC)