This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
oops. there appears to be a difference between estate and estate car. well done, hcheney. akaDruid 17:41, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I've just added the X-TYPE picture. Out of interest I went to www.jaguar.com to see how the name of the car is written and it's Jaguar X-TYPE (in capitals). I've also checked in Google Images and found two rear-view pics of the X-TYPE that clearly show the capitals. So should I change all references to X-type to X-TYPE? This applies to S-TYPE as well. I don't know how to change the article title nor the template at the bottom. - Adrian Pingstone 16:01, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
In this section there is written the X-TYPE estate car is the second ever Jaguar estate car. I really can't see which has been the first (if any).
You're right, it was the 'shooting break', a break derived from a sports car (like Volvo P1800 ES or Aston Martin DB5 Shooting Break). Technically, it's not the same as an estate car, especially not the same as the X-Type break.
Lynx produced a limited number of XJS estate cars. These were after market conversions and so not Jaguar products: http://www.lynxmotors.co.uk/eerf.htm http://austin-rover.co.uk/lynxeventf.htm
Jaguar produced a prototype XJ40 estate: http://austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?2003necf.htm (scroll about 1/2 way down)
and Avon produced this rathe awkward and clumsy looking Series 3 estate: http://austin-rover.co.uk/avonxj6f.htm
LewisR ( talk) 15:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
"It was the first Jaguar model designed by Ian Callum." Ian STYLED the car, he certainly didn't design it. What do you think the other 1500+ engineers on that project did? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LewisR ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
An X-Type R version of the car was developed. It used a 330bhp supercharged V6 engine (AJ67 IIRC). That engine was placed into a number of modified Mondeos which also ran the 4wd system as development cars. The engine was also being developed for Jaguar's 2nd attempt at an E-Type replacement, the X600. All three (R, SC engine & X600) programmes were haulted though for possibly one or more of the following reasons: Overall developement costs, durability of 330bhp in the bottom end of the V6, the V6 wouldn't package in the proposed X600.
LewisR (
talk) 02:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
The 2006 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is backed up by its 528 horsepower. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
66.213.65.36 (
talk) 21:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
"The 2006 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is backed up by its 528 horsepower. " Sorry? What's that about? LewisR ( talk) 05:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The article states "The Jaguar AJ-V6 engine design is unique to the Jaguar X-Type".
This is false.
The 2.5 & 3.0 V6 were both used in the S-Type, and the 3.0 was used in the X250 XF, X350 XJ and Lincoln LS.
LewisR (
talk) 04:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jaguar X-Type. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This featured in a photograph on the front page of the Daily Express on Monday April 19th 2021. RGCorris ( talk) 16:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Wondering if there's anything with us area that is compatible strut assembly 2600:1700:D7F0:11A0:7951:B520:F59E:6C72 ( talk) 04:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
oops. there appears to be a difference between estate and estate car. well done, hcheney. akaDruid 17:41, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I've just added the X-TYPE picture. Out of interest I went to www.jaguar.com to see how the name of the car is written and it's Jaguar X-TYPE (in capitals). I've also checked in Google Images and found two rear-view pics of the X-TYPE that clearly show the capitals. So should I change all references to X-type to X-TYPE? This applies to S-TYPE as well. I don't know how to change the article title nor the template at the bottom. - Adrian Pingstone 16:01, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
In this section there is written the X-TYPE estate car is the second ever Jaguar estate car. I really can't see which has been the first (if any).
You're right, it was the 'shooting break', a break derived from a sports car (like Volvo P1800 ES or Aston Martin DB5 Shooting Break). Technically, it's not the same as an estate car, especially not the same as the X-Type break.
Lynx produced a limited number of XJS estate cars. These were after market conversions and so not Jaguar products: http://www.lynxmotors.co.uk/eerf.htm http://austin-rover.co.uk/lynxeventf.htm
Jaguar produced a prototype XJ40 estate: http://austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?2003necf.htm (scroll about 1/2 way down)
and Avon produced this rathe awkward and clumsy looking Series 3 estate: http://austin-rover.co.uk/avonxj6f.htm
LewisR ( talk) 15:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
"It was the first Jaguar model designed by Ian Callum." Ian STYLED the car, he certainly didn't design it. What do you think the other 1500+ engineers on that project did? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LewisR ( talk • contribs) 05:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
An X-Type R version of the car was developed. It used a 330bhp supercharged V6 engine (AJ67 IIRC). That engine was placed into a number of modified Mondeos which also ran the 4wd system as development cars. The engine was also being developed for Jaguar's 2nd attempt at an E-Type replacement, the X600. All three (R, SC engine & X600) programmes were haulted though for possibly one or more of the following reasons: Overall developement costs, durability of 330bhp in the bottom end of the V6, the V6 wouldn't package in the proposed X600.
LewisR (
talk) 02:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
The 2006 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is backed up by its 528 horsepower. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
66.213.65.36 (
talk) 21:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
"The 2006 Jaguar X-Type 3.0 is backed up by its 528 horsepower. " Sorry? What's that about? LewisR ( talk) 05:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The article states "The Jaguar AJ-V6 engine design is unique to the Jaguar X-Type".
This is false.
The 2.5 & 3.0 V6 were both used in the S-Type, and the 3.0 was used in the X250 XF, X350 XJ and Lincoln LS.
LewisR (
talk) 04:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jaguar X-Type. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
This featured in a photograph on the front page of the Daily Express on Monday April 19th 2021. RGCorris ( talk) 16:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Wondering if there's anything with us area that is compatible strut assembly 2600:1700:D7F0:11A0:7951:B520:F59E:6C72 ( talk) 04:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)