From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:MILHIST Assessment

A fine start, though all references to "World War 2" should be changed to "World War II" or "the Second World War". The use of Arabic numerals in this particular context is not standard and looks amateurish. LordAmeth 18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Poor use of headers

The headers used for the history do not make sense, particularly Moscow (1942), and Normandy. By '42 the chance to take Moscow had gone and the Normandy section really doesn't have anything to do with Normandy. I'll try to improve it later when I have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.140.24 ( talk) 12:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Recent edit

Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:MILHIST Assessment

A fine start, though all references to "World War 2" should be changed to "World War II" or "the Second World War". The use of Arabic numerals in this particular context is not standard and looks amateurish. LordAmeth 18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Poor use of headers

The headers used for the history do not make sense, particularly Moscow (1942), and Normandy. By '42 the chance to take Moscow had gone and the Normandy section really doesn't have anything to do with Normandy. I'll try to improve it later when I have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.140.24 ( talk) 12:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Recent edit

Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook