![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fine start, though all references to "World War 2" should be changed to "World War II" or "the Second World War". The use of Arabic numerals in this particular context is not standard and looks amateurish. LordAmeth 18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The headers used for the history do not make sense, particularly Moscow (1942), and Normandy. By '42 the chance to take Moscow had gone and the Normandy section really doesn't have anything to do with Normandy. I'll try to improve it later when I have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.140.24 ( talk) 12:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fine start, though all references to "World War 2" should be changed to "World War II" or "the Second World War". The use of Arabic numerals in this particular context is not standard and looks amateurish. LordAmeth 18:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The headers used for the history do not make sense, particularly Moscow (1942), and Normandy. By '42 the chance to take Moscow had gone and the Normandy section really doesn't have anything to do with Normandy. I'll try to improve it later when I have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.140.24 ( talk) 12:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)