This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jagdgeschwader 27 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Some very nice work, and surely B-class for length and detail. But I am puzzled by the second sentence of the article: "It was based in North Africa and Tunisia during the first, victories year of the Afrika Korps." What does "first, victories year" mean? Should that read differently somehow? LordAmeth 18:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I presume that the missing III./JG 27 record is the in effect the discrepancy between the agrregate totals of I gruppe and the II and the grand Total? I won't change it until that assumption is validated by the original contributor.
Secondly- the comment on JG 27's overclaiming taken from Brown's book is in my opinion simply his interpretation of the statistics, and as all fighter units can be accused of overclaiming, this pargraph could be inserted into all air fighting squadron/unit history entries in Wikipedia! Surely this should form part of a more specific enrty/ Harryurz ( talk) 19:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The flow of the article seems adequate, apart from the sudden diversion into the merits (or otherwise) of JG 27's claims for aircraft destroyed in September 1942.If all are agreeable I will remove the overclaiming pparagraph from the main body of the text and insert into the appropriate scetion. Thanks Harryurz ( talk) 16:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
The material was restored in violation of WP:BURDEN; I'm preserving it here by proving this link. Adding from section "Overclaiming": cited to a fan site or uncited: diff. Adding from section "Statistics" (completely uncited, possibly dubious): diff. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jagdgeschwader 27 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Some very nice work, and surely B-class for length and detail. But I am puzzled by the second sentence of the article: "It was based in North Africa and Tunisia during the first, victories year of the Afrika Korps." What does "first, victories year" mean? Should that read differently somehow? LordAmeth 18:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I presume that the missing III./JG 27 record is the in effect the discrepancy between the agrregate totals of I gruppe and the II and the grand Total? I won't change it until that assumption is validated by the original contributor.
Secondly- the comment on JG 27's overclaiming taken from Brown's book is in my opinion simply his interpretation of the statistics, and as all fighter units can be accused of overclaiming, this pargraph could be inserted into all air fighting squadron/unit history entries in Wikipedia! Surely this should form part of a more specific enrty/ Harryurz ( talk) 19:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The flow of the article seems adequate, apart from the sudden diversion into the merits (or otherwise) of JG 27's claims for aircraft destroyed in September 1942.If all are agreeable I will remove the overclaiming pparagraph from the main body of the text and insert into the appropriate scetion. Thanks Harryurz ( talk) 16:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
The material was restored in violation of WP:BURDEN; I'm preserving it here by proving this link. Adding from section "Overclaiming": cited to a fan site or uncited: diff. Adding from section "Statistics" (completely uncited, possibly dubious): diff. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)