![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacques Goulet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I removed the following from the article. It was under the bibliography section, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to be. It does not appear to be encyclopedic content.- Mr X 🖋 20:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Legend
- Fichier Origine - Répertoire informatisé de la Fédération québécoise des sociétés de généalogie en partenariat avec la Fédération française de généalogie
- Nos Origines - Site web, Généalogie du Québec et française d'Amérique
- PRDH - Programme de recherche en démographie historique / Research Program in Historical Demography, Université de Montréal
- PREFEN - Programme de recherche sur l'émigration des français en Nouvelle-France, Université de Caen
The consensus is no, the article citations in this article should not be changed from citation style 1 to Harvard style.
Should the citations in this article be changed from citation style 1 to Harvard style?- Mr X 🖋 20:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
"Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change."- Mr X 🖋 21:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
harvnb}}
template and the |ref=harv
parameter), the need for scrolling is very much reduced. Nor is it a change from CS1 style - CS1 is not a style but a family of templates such as {{
cite book}}
. In that edit, these templates are still present, they're just in a different part of the article, where they have been linked form the short citations. The number of CS1 templates has in fact increased, from 21 to 26. Now if I look at the
previous version, what I see is a lot of inconsistency - it is true that many refs are constructed using CS1 templates, but some are untemplated, and some (the first five) are already in the form of shortened footnotes. It's clear to me that what
Cblambert (
talk ·
contribs) has done is to bring consistency where there was little before. So I support the change from a mixture of styles to a consistent use of shortened footnotes. I would, however, prefer a simpler approach to the
Bibliography section, where the <br>
tags are redundant and an ordinary bulleted list would be better than double colons and a hyphen. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 07:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacques Goulet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I removed the following from the article. It was under the bibliography section, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to be. It does not appear to be encyclopedic content.- Mr X 🖋 20:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Legend
- Fichier Origine - Répertoire informatisé de la Fédération québécoise des sociétés de généalogie en partenariat avec la Fédération française de généalogie
- Nos Origines - Site web, Généalogie du Québec et française d'Amérique
- PRDH - Programme de recherche en démographie historique / Research Program in Historical Demography, Université de Montréal
- PREFEN - Programme de recherche sur l'émigration des français en Nouvelle-France, Université de Caen
The consensus is no, the article citations in this article should not be changed from citation style 1 to Harvard style.
Should the citations in this article be changed from citation style 1 to Harvard style?- Mr X 🖋 20:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
"Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change."- Mr X 🖋 21:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
{{
harvnb}}
template and the |ref=harv
parameter), the need for scrolling is very much reduced. Nor is it a change from CS1 style - CS1 is not a style but a family of templates such as {{
cite book}}
. In that edit, these templates are still present, they're just in a different part of the article, where they have been linked form the short citations. The number of CS1 templates has in fact increased, from 21 to 26. Now if I look at the
previous version, what I see is a lot of inconsistency - it is true that many refs are constructed using CS1 templates, but some are untemplated, and some (the first five) are already in the form of shortened footnotes. It's clear to me that what
Cblambert (
talk ·
contribs) has done is to bring consistency where there was little before. So I support the change from a mixture of styles to a consistent use of shortened footnotes. I would, however, prefer a simpler approach to the
Bibliography section, where the <br>
tags are redundant and an ordinary bulleted list would be better than double colons and a hyphen. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 07:28, 27 April 2018 (UTC)