This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
What makes this disappearance notable?
leparsdon (
talk) 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
There does appear to be
significant and sustained coverage. Besides all the references included in the article, here are a few more pieces of coverage that I found with a quick google search:
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. I think the amount of news coverage satisfies GNG and there may be further coverage in books and academic literature - I'm not personally up for going down that research rabbithole today though :P
Ethmostigmus (
talk) 06:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
So does this mean any media covered case of a similar nature qualifies as notable? Even if it is highly regional and the coverage is all incredibly recent?
leparsdon (
talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It should also be noted that all the sources you have from the google search all say the exact same thing just with the amount of time they've been missing updated.
leparsdon (
talk) 15:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't think an incident being "regional" makes it non-notable, and coverage of this family is certainly not all recent - the articles I found on the first page of google are all from the 2010s-present day, as this is the period in which online news really took off (with the
National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, in which relatives of the family participated, occurring from 2016-2019), but the references included in the article itself include from the 80s and 90s up to 2023 and even more coverage is most certainly available in newspaper archives. This does, in my opinion, rise to the level of significant coverage. The fact that the sources I linked in my comment repeat similar information isn't really relevant to questions of notability - there are only so many ways of telling a story, after all.
Ultimately, if you dispute the notability of this article, you are most welcome to take it to AfD for further discussion.
Ethmostigmus (
talk |
contribs) 09:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Native Americans,
Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related
indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
What makes this disappearance notable?
leparsdon (
talk) 18:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
There does appear to be
significant and sustained coverage. Besides all the references included in the article, here are a few more pieces of coverage that I found with a quick google search:
[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. I think the amount of news coverage satisfies GNG and there may be further coverage in books and academic literature - I'm not personally up for going down that research rabbithole today though :P
Ethmostigmus (
talk) 06:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
So does this mean any media covered case of a similar nature qualifies as notable? Even if it is highly regional and the coverage is all incredibly recent?
leparsdon (
talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It should also be noted that all the sources you have from the google search all say the exact same thing just with the amount of time they've been missing updated.
leparsdon (
talk) 15:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't think an incident being "regional" makes it non-notable, and coverage of this family is certainly not all recent - the articles I found on the first page of google are all from the 2010s-present day, as this is the period in which online news really took off (with the
National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, in which relatives of the family participated, occurring from 2016-2019), but the references included in the article itself include from the 80s and 90s up to 2023 and even more coverage is most certainly available in newspaper archives. This does, in my opinion, rise to the level of significant coverage. The fact that the sources I linked in my comment repeat similar information isn't really relevant to questions of notability - there are only so many ways of telling a story, after all.
Ultimately, if you dispute the notability of this article, you are most welcome to take it to AfD for further discussion.
Ethmostigmus (
talk |
contribs) 09:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply