Currently we're developing a content fork at 2Day FM#2000s and King Edward VII's Hospital Sister Agnes.
I'm just noting this here in the hope of pre-emptively explaining (to newcomers, rather than regulars) why it wouldn't be appropriate for such articles to be developed at the moment. -- Trevj ( talk) 19:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't even think this page should have been created. She is merely metioned, nothing more. if I type in Jacintha Saldanha - or any other name - and I see that there is such a page, I expect to see a page with information ABOUT the subject, who he/she was, where he/she was born, etc etc. This redirect page is ridiculous. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Why do you think people should not be interested on the death of the nurse if they are suspecting of the very bizarre story that was told on the media? For instance, I know lots of folks that are interested to learn more about generalities of the victim (such as the place where she was born, etc.) in order to understand why she decided(?) to commit suicide. If it was another person related with the story instead of the British royal family, would you have the same treatment? From whom is Wikipedia afraid? If Wikipedia doesn't want to provide alternatives sources of information to current media, what is the interest of this service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.8.201 ( talk) 15:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Looks like the redirect is for publicity for the Radio Station, the death is very fishy, and that needs to be noted in Wikipedia instead of her death been an advertisement on Wikipedia. We also need to find out, if she was killed for publicity, instead of stiffling her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.222 ( talk) 05:49, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Currently we're developing a content fork at 2Day FM#2000s and King Edward VII's Hospital Sister Agnes.
I'm just noting this here in the hope of pre-emptively explaining (to newcomers, rather than regulars) why it wouldn't be appropriate for such articles to be developed at the moment. -- Trevj ( talk) 19:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't even think this page should have been created. She is merely metioned, nothing more. if I type in Jacintha Saldanha - or any other name - and I see that there is such a page, I expect to see a page with information ABOUT the subject, who he/she was, where he/she was born, etc etc. This redirect page is ridiculous. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 20:41, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Why do you think people should not be interested on the death of the nurse if they are suspecting of the very bizarre story that was told on the media? For instance, I know lots of folks that are interested to learn more about generalities of the victim (such as the place where she was born, etc.) in order to understand why she decided(?) to commit suicide. If it was another person related with the story instead of the British royal family, would you have the same treatment? From whom is Wikipedia afraid? If Wikipedia doesn't want to provide alternatives sources of information to current media, what is the interest of this service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.8.201 ( talk) 15:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Looks like the redirect is for publicity for the Radio Station, the death is very fishy, and that needs to be noted in Wikipedia instead of her death been an advertisement on Wikipedia. We also need to find out, if she was killed for publicity, instead of stiffling her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.103.222 ( talk) 05:49, 12 December 2012 (UTC)