![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
IANS Hindi Film Review has rated 4star to Jab Tak Hai Jaan. And quoting "Fall in Love with Love again!". Source- IANS Hindi Film Review, IANS Hindi Film Review Please insert in the (Section6 i.e. Critical Reception, Sub Section 6.2 i.e. INDIA) Professional Reviews Column with Review Scores. Please Edit it.
Professional reviews | |
---|---|
Review scores | |
Source | Rating |
Bollywood Hungama | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IndiaWeekly | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IANS | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Filmfare | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Zee News | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Koimoi | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
NDTV | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Times of India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
India TV | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hindustan Times | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CNN-IBN | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DNA India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Digital Spy | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rediff † | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Indian Express | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
† indicates that the given rating is an average rating of all reviews provided by the source |
SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA ( talk) 11:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jab Tak Hai Jaan` earns Rs.60.39 crore in four days <" http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/bollywood/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns-rs-60-39-crore-in-four-days_122899.htm">
JAB TAK HAI JAAN EARNS WHOPPING RS 26 CRORES OVERSEAS<" http://www.deccanherald.com/videos/watch/2996/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns.html"> 59.177.75.73 ( talk) 18:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Just want the Conflicting reports section but it should be expanded.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jab tak hai jaan mostly received positive reviews from critics in india. [1]
The film garnered positive reviews from overseas critics as well. [2]
Kindly note that it is written that it received mostly positive reviews from critics in india. so it would be wrong to say it received positive to mixed reviews as only 1 out of 15 reviews mentioned in the table here also gave less than 3 stars. its my humble request to pay attention to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voiceinside19 ( talk • contribs)
Dear
You said in yoyr answer that you only use boxofficeindia for bollywood collections then why you have used entertainment.oneindia.in for Talassh box office colection. Please refer to the following link you have used for Talassh.
http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/box-office/2012/aamir-talaash-7-days-first-week-collection-box-office-101763.html
If you can do so for Talassh you also update Jab Tak Hai Jaan collection to Rs 184.33 Crore for Jab Tak Hai Jaan as well. Please refer to the following link
Update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.59.135.240 ( talk) 14:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Various Websites on Internet showing five days worldwide collection is 106 crores worldwide. Below are some boxoffice sites that are showing worldwide collections. Boxoffice is showing only Indian box office collections not showing worldwide collection. So I have given you few sites that are showing worldwide collection & all showing worldwide collection is 105 crores in 5 days.
<" http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainmenttags/katrina-kaif/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-cr-worldwide-5-days"> <" http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-crores-at-the-worldwide-box-office/"> <" http://www.boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx?id=903"> <" http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-first-week-collection/"> <" http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crossed-100-crores/"
120.56.164.150 ( talk) 18:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Luckycoolboy94 ( talk) 06:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. - you haven't given any details of a proposed edit.
Begoon
talk
06:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
JTHJ enters Top 10 in the USA. Please add this info. Source - http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/the-weekend-report-19/ Source - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/bollywood/9690439/Bollywood-film-Jab-Tak-Hai-Jaan-makes-U.S-Top-10.html
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
YASH CHOPRA’S “JAB TAK HAI JAAN”… A WORLDWIDE BLOCKBUSTER! JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr
JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS
JAB TAK HAI JAAN opened worldwide on Diwali, 13th Nov 2012, to a tremendous response at the box office and has set several collection landmarks ever since.
ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr
It is the highest first day collection ever for any film released on Laxmi Pooja day, even though it did not have a solo release.
It is also Shahrukh Khan's highest opening day figure, ahead of both RA.One and DON2, which had solo releases.
OVERSEAS
JAB TAK HAI JAAN takes the International Box Office by storm.
JTHJ recorded some mind boggling figures for the opening day (Tuesday) screenings on a limited overseas release, as the film opened in stages over 14th, 15th, and 16th November.
The film has had a tremendous response and the audience reactions have been extremely positive. What has been most touching is that everyone is sitting through the end credits as the film pays a tribute to Yash Chopra, which makes it even more special.
OVERSEAS GROSS BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday $1.30 Million Wednesday $1.20 Million Thursday $1.08 Million Friday $1.35 Million Saturday $1.52 Million Sunday $1.13 Million TOTAL $ 7.58 Million TOTAL OVERSEAS 41.7 crores
This is the highest grossing weekend for any Bollywood film overseas! <" http://www.yashrajfilms.com/News/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=1d3cf0a4-a473-4513-ae21-2864f6464dd5"> Bharatpandey2007 ( talk) 08:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Source - http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/hindi/article/88404.html US - Opened at No. 5 on the US Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever
UK - Opened at No. 4 on the UK Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever .
Middle East - No. 1 at the Box Office and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever. The fastest ever in the Middle East for an Indian Film to reach the 2 Million Figure - in 5 days.
Australia - Opened at No. 2 on the Australia Box Office charts (limited release) and the highest opening Bollywood Film ever.
New Zealand - First Bollywood Film to open at No. 1, overtaking all Hollywood Films on Wednesday.
Germany - Opened at No. 7 on the German BO.
Pakistan - All time record of highest Opening Day collections for Film ever.
Singapore - All time record of highest Opening Bollywood Film ever.
Please add this data to the article.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The critics reviews have been mostly positive, not positive to mixed. Simbola16 ( talk) 10:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
total worldwide collections: 179.80 cr nett See link to verify request: http://boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx 199.64.0.253 ( talk) 00:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Jthj Domestic box office - 116.5 crore Jthj overseas box office - 63.5 crore Jthj worldwide box office - 180 crore
By Analyst Taran Adarsh Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 ( talk) 09:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
URL http://buzzcinemas.com/2012/11/29/jab-tak-hai-jaan-17th-day-worldwide-box-office-collection-reports/.html Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 ( talk) 09:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
100 crore in 17 days is fake n I checked in box office India is written something else. This link will show u the exact box office collection from day1 to day 17 here is the link http://m.oneindia.in/entertainment/bollywood/box-office/2012/jab-tak-hai-jaan-2nd-week-17-days-collection-box-office-101582.html This is just the domestic nett This is site is the same as box office India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.101.118 ( talk) 05:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film is "hit" not "superhit" according to BoxOfficeIndia.com: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=earnings
So in the third paragraph it should be " Box Office India declared the film a "hit" in India"
139.190.140.12 ( talk) 05:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Done ----
Plea$ant 1623
✉
14:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
The film has done excellent bussiness in overseas as it is usual for SRK and with a budget of around 50 cr ,finally it reached a figure of 100 cr in domestic market in struggling way.I am just wondering how can YRF and other trade analyst called it a worldwide blockbuster.I do not remove it from article myself because i do not want edit warring.Is yash raj website considered reliable?Please discuss about this issue. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Jineshparekh ( talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)I have a pretty straight opinion. Nett collection of a film reported only by the respective distribution studio should be considered because it the most correct. The reason is simple. The figures reported by the respective distribution studio are subject to statutory audits. The distribution studio reports the nett collection, which is the share it gets from ticket collections at box office, but after deduction of entertainment tax, to media. Hence, any over-reporting results in higher payment of entertainment tax and higher tax deduction at source (TDS). The concurrent statutory auditor of the studio is supposed to publish such over-reporting in his/her audit observation if the corresponding tax liabilities are not adhered to and paid by the distribution studio.
Besides, What is the credibility of Box Office India to question the collection reported by the distributor. Are they even aware of the subsequent tax implication on such over-reporting as they always claim about any film? BOI, except for publishing the collection on its own website, has no credibility whatsoever. For the collection report of BOI to be even considered for debate, one needs to be aware of the mechanism being adopted by BOI to find out collections from theater across India. The collection figures reported by BOI are not subject to any statutory audit. Hence, they can report what they wish to unlike the distribution studio.
in case of Jab Tak Hai Jaan, the film has collected Rs. 1.21 billion at the end of three weeks run, as reported by Yash Raj Films Limited. This is the most correct reporting. The film is a world wide block buster as declared by the offical distribution studio.
Previous figures given by boxofficeindia are estimates and around figure while latter it gave exact territorial breakdown which was exact one.It is an obvious thing and boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all.And at last you Ashermadan cowardly poisoned others users ears against me.Is that correct as it is not an arena,Do it in civil manner.Why dont you dare to discuss with me or other experienced users. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The conflicting reports must stay. Just the reason that(and i quote zeeyanketu) "boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all" is too illogical and naive to be taken seriously. BOI is a privately owned website, with no official stature. So, in case conflicting reports appear, they must be mentioned. I agree with ashermadan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An0nim0sity ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Following a discussion few years back a consensus was made to use boxofficeindia as a reliable source for boxoffice figures of Bollywood films at wikipedia and we found it in every good article.As far as i have seen it is the only website which give results in algorithmic way although estimated figures are given earlier and exact figures updated latter on.It took time but never failed as usual for any good website and it is obvious that 10 different websites give different figures and then only break the stability of article.What is the need to add conflicting reports as there no need for it as i think.So,I want views of only experience users here so there will be no edit warring regarding this.Thankx ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
While everyone here agrees to keep Box Office India for the Bollywood box office, users like AsherMadan has a history of pushing his agenda on SRK films. Wants to make everything fanboyish. Something like "It will collect more if Yash Raj Films decide to release it in other markets" is barely encyclopedic. Has a long history as we all know. Repeat, the consensus is to keep Box Office India time and again. -- 139.190.140.12 ( talk) 22:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
How can you easily said anyone vandal,troll and sockpuppet.That means you dont even know the exact meaning of these.You have a terrible history of edit warring and you were blocked twice too.Only boxofficemojo has been used for Hollywood films as Boxofficeindia for Bollywood.It cannot be changed for you.Not a single experienced user might be agree with you.It will be removed by further discusson. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 03:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Note: I am not related to any of these discussions, nor do I operate any sockpuppets. Do not connect my name with false accusations based on little to no evidence. --
GSK ●
✉
✓
19:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07
Son of sardaar nett grossed 105.03 crores. And Taran adarsh tweetsis a genuine sources.It has more than 2 lakhs followers on twitter,He takes data from production houses.,Even
Ajay Devgan tweeted on Guru purnima day,Nov28,2012 Evening 4 PM that
Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crores in india nett. you can check his tweet.some exceeptions can be made in wikipedia if
Box Office India is changing its figures 3-4 times. this doesn't happens ,but basically after
Golmaal 3it is changing drastically for these diwali releases. See these links:
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5133&nCat=
changed 75 cr to 69 cr for 10 days in india
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5139&nCat=
So please have conflicting reports in Son Of Sardaar also User talk:Abhinavname 05:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think the sentence below is very inaccurate:
However, Yash Raj Films and independent trade analysts called the film a "worldwide blockbuster."
It only uses one cite that goes to the producers of the film Yash Raj who claims so. It does NOT cite any other sources for "independent trade analysts" who called the film "worldwide blockbuster". And claims from producers isn't even third-party independent data as we all know. It should be changed to:
However, the production company Yash Raj Films claimed that the film was a "worldwide blockbuster."
139.190.140.12 ( talk) 22:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
y not go by boxofficeindia.co.in figure?they r also a ccredible site,boxoffice india changed the collection 3 times ,and their data differs from all the other data given by other sites and trade analysits who more or less agree on their data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.139.144 ( talk) 04:59, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
What about Son of Sardaar and singham.???? Both are in 100-crore club by many sites and reliable sources.conflicting reports should be here also. See hese links: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07 http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/917/date/2012-11-30 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-11-30/box-office/35484121_1_crore-mark-ajay-devgn-ffilms-ashwni-dhir http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/son-of-sardaar-beats-bol-bachchan-grabs-7th-position-in-koimoi-top-10-india-box-office-2012/ http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?Section=Movies&ID=299099&subcatg=&keyword=bollywood&nid=299099 http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/movies/son-of-sardar-crosses-rs-100-crore-mark-in-india_123621.htm http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/son-of-sardaar-enters-100-crore-club/1/235423.html
Many sources such Taran Adarsh ,Times of India,Bollywood Hungama, Zee news,NDTV,Koimoi, etc. have stated that Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crore (US$18.2 million) nett.gross in India in 16 days.But Box Office India has stated only 88 cr(original 105 cr) for Son of Sardaar and 102 crore(origibal 120 cr) for Jab Tak Hai Jaan,after 3 weeks run in India.See this link: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat= Also BOI downgraded the verdict on JTHJ in india from "superhit" to hit" see this link: http://boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5136&nCat= and then it removed this page content. No trade magazine or website except Box Office India is giving wrong estimates early on,and deleting that page content. Please add conflicitng reports section on Son of sardaar and singham.Even for Barfi ,BOI has given only 106 cr(original its 120 cr )
I rember this Eid Day,on August 20,2012, Just n the evening when Taran Adarsh tweeted 100 cr nett. for Ek tha Tiger in 5 days,all New channels like Aaj Tak,Zee News,CNN-IBN and trade magazines statrted giving news of 100 cr for ETT from 4 pm in evening,while BOI has stated it crossed in 6 days. The difference in BOI and other sources(all these give same figures) is now growing from 5 cr to 13 cr and now its 18 cr fro JTHJ and SOS. Abhinavname ( talk) 06:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
even ibtimes.com saying domestic collection 120 crore http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/413753/20121211/jab-tak-hai-jaan-box-office-collection.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.128.11 ( talk) 08:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I suggest to move almost all of the 8. Box Office section to a new distinct Wikipedia page entitled:
Jab Tak Hai Jaan (box office),
(just as is done with section 7. Soundtrack : Main article:
Jab Tak Hai Jaan (soundtrack)).
That new JTHJ box office page would get Full protection, to stop edit warring between users, but those users, mainly interested in the film gross, could still continue the discussion about box-office figures on the "Talk" page of that new dedicated page.
Doing so would allow unprotecting the Jab Tak Hai Jaan page, so that users could resume contributing to the content, which is all Wikipedia is about. Bernarddb ( talk) 13:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Meanwhile, the Article page itself is half-dead, as people can no longer contribute. All that for a "small section" that should be of a few lines only... Bernarddb ( talk) 13:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
the film crossed 100 crores in just six days.please make a note of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.55.174 ( talk) 09:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
According to BOI, the film has now earned 102 crores:
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat=
So please change the sentence to:
While Box Office India stated that the film made around INR102 crore
139.190.171.30 ( talk) 16:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
See this link: JTHJ nett grossed ₹ 120 crore+ in india http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07 A gap of 18 crore And y only concentrating on JTHJ,even Son of Sardaar ,Barfi and ETT domestic nett gross in india is given 13-16 cr less by Box Office India.Exceptions can be made by including Bollywood Hungama and Koimoi figures. It will look weird to movie buff and people who are loving Bollywood films trade nad their collections,that when they browse these films article on Wikipedia,it willl show data in india less than 15 cr.When all 6-7 sources like Times of India,aaj Tak,Zee News, NDTV,Bollywood Hungama,Koimoi,Taran Adarsh,Komal Nahta etc. are giving same exact figures and BOI is giving different(first its giving wrong estimate,and then sometimes, deleting that page content when u want to see that page) BOI has downgraded verdict on Jab Tak Hai Jaan in india from Superhit to hit .Can u believe,Why it is giving wrong estimates then early on. Taran Adarsh take nett gross figures from production houses, but BOI takes from exibitors,distributors and multiplexes.that y when calculating worldwide gross figures, Box Office India can give entertainment tax. But stilll in worldwide gross also,BOI doesnot include tamil and telugu version gross.
Abhinavname ( talk) 15:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
The early figures are only estimates and near around.Updating exact figures take time dear.If it didnot update figures of other version(telugu,tamil etc) then you are welcome to add them from any reliable sources at the end of section's. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
boi has changed their data for jthj 3 times..its reports r varrying from other reliable sites and trade analysts by a huge margin who r more or less consistent among thmeselves,boxofficeindia.co.in also gives 120 cr as 3 week collection of jthj so boi is not trustworthy anymore and majority report should be mentioned in main article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.222.67 ( talk) 07:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
nope boxofficeindia.co.in gives day by day territrorial breakdown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.80.20 ( talk) 04:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template.
Sandstein
16:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Alright, this issue is plaguing a number of different articles, and keeps coming up all of the time. First of all, 139.190.171.30 (or anyone else), please point me to the specific discussion in which it was determined that Boxoffice India is not a reliable source. Looking at the site, the Wikipedia article about the site, and other info, they appear to meet wP:RS, but if previous discussions established that they are not (ideally, discussions at a central location, like WP:RS or WT:INB), then I will understand.
Second, could somebody please explain to me why the hell this matters? WP:NOTNEWS says that we are not a newspaper. We do not need to have week-by-week updates of the amount of money made by the film. In fact, I could make a strong argument that we shouldn't include any box office numbers until the film is out of the theaters, except if a secondary source like a newspaper or TV news program actually commented on it. It is not within our mission to be looking for instant updates from these box office tracking sites on a day-by-day basis. No harm whatsoever is done if Wikipedia's numbers are inaccurate for a few days. And now that I look at the article, I'd like a justification for the entire Box office section. As a general rule, Wikipedia does not report on "Week one, they made this, Week 2, they made this." etc. We should have particularly noteworthy info (i.e., that which is discussed in significant news stories), and a final total. So, it seems like there's a really easy way to solve this controversy: cut out almost the entire section. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Please add the accolades section List of accolades received by Jab Tak Hai Jaan into the article after box office. Add = = Accolades = = and link this page to the main article. The award season has started and Jab Tak Hai Jaan has won some awards. -Ashermadan
Recently zeeyanketu put a WP:PROD on List of accolades received by Jab Tak Hai Jaan. However, since zeeyanketu was recommending that information be added to this article, the correct procedure is to request a merger, not a deletion. As such, I have declined that deletion request and am starting up the merger discussion. Here is a copy of zeeyanketu's prod rationale:
Article is not too long and references are copy pasted directly from main article.Its is better in main article because it has reasonable space only.Information is given about film in lead section but not regarding awards and award and nominations list has only single accolades.It is unusual a new article for single or two,three awards.
Please note that I personally am expressing no opinion on the matter; I'm merely fixing the procedural deficiency. Other editors should comment below about whether or not they think the content should be merged or remain as a separate article. Qwyrxian ( talk) 22:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Let keep it simple,merge it after three days unless it will be expanded to some extant where it will looked satisfactory. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 11:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
One small note: merger discussions are never closed for at least a week, and many run for up to a month. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
jab tak hai jaan grossed 100 crores worldwide in just six days.please make a note of it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.55.174 ( talk) 09:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
May I know now what is the consensus? Forgot to put name ( talk) 05:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I can't edit this page but the sentence "Sukanya Verma of Rediff described the film as an "an elegant, harmless entertainer for most part" and praised the visuals, acting and music." should not have two "an". Thanks Exadrid ( talk) 04:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
IANS Hindi Film Review has rated 4star to Jab Tak Hai Jaan. And quoting "Fall in Love with Love again!". Source- IANS Hindi Film Review, IANS Hindi Film Review Please insert in the (Section6 i.e. Critical Reception, Sub Section 6.2 i.e. INDIA) Professional Reviews Column with Review Scores. Please Edit it.
Professional reviews | |
---|---|
Review scores | |
Source | Rating |
Bollywood Hungama | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IndiaWeekly | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IANS | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Filmfare | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Zee News | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Koimoi | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
NDTV | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Times of India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
India TV | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hindustan Times | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CNN-IBN | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DNA India | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Digital Spy | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rediff † | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Indian Express | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
† indicates that the given rating is an average rating of all reviews provided by the source |
SUMITKRISHNAGUPTA ( talk) 11:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jab Tak Hai Jaan` earns Rs.60.39 crore in four days <" http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/bollywood/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns-rs-60-39-crore-in-four-days_122899.htm">
JAB TAK HAI JAAN EARNS WHOPPING RS 26 CRORES OVERSEAS<" http://www.deccanherald.com/videos/watch/2996/jab-tak-hai-jaan-earns.html"> 59.177.75.73 ( talk) 18:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Just want the Conflicting reports section but it should be expanded.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Jab tak hai jaan mostly received positive reviews from critics in india. [1]
The film garnered positive reviews from overseas critics as well. [2]
Kindly note that it is written that it received mostly positive reviews from critics in india. so it would be wrong to say it received positive to mixed reviews as only 1 out of 15 reviews mentioned in the table here also gave less than 3 stars. its my humble request to pay attention to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voiceinside19 ( talk • contribs)
Dear
You said in yoyr answer that you only use boxofficeindia for bollywood collections then why you have used entertainment.oneindia.in for Talassh box office colection. Please refer to the following link you have used for Talassh.
http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/box-office/2012/aamir-talaash-7-days-first-week-collection-box-office-101763.html
If you can do so for Talassh you also update Jab Tak Hai Jaan collection to Rs 184.33 Crore for Jab Tak Hai Jaan as well. Please refer to the following link
Update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.59.135.240 ( talk) 14:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Various Websites on Internet showing five days worldwide collection is 106 crores worldwide. Below are some boxoffice sites that are showing worldwide collections. Boxoffice is showing only Indian box office collections not showing worldwide collection. So I have given you few sites that are showing worldwide collection & all showing worldwide collection is 105 crores in 5 days.
<" http://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainmenttags/katrina-kaif/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-cr-worldwide-5-days"> <" http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crosses-100-crores-at-the-worldwide-box-office/"> <" http://www.boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx?id=903"> <" http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-first-week-collection/"> <" http://boxofficeonline.in/jab-tak-hai-jaan-crossed-100-crores/"
120.56.164.150 ( talk) 18:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Luckycoolboy94 ( talk) 06:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. - you haven't given any details of a proposed edit.
Begoon
talk
06:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
JTHJ enters Top 10 in the USA. Please add this info. Source - http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/the-weekend-report-19/ Source - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/bollywood/9690439/Bollywood-film-Jab-Tak-Hai-Jaan-makes-U.S-Top-10.html
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
YASH CHOPRA’S “JAB TAK HAI JAAN”… A WORLDWIDE BLOCKBUSTER! JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr
JAB TAK HAI JAAN COLLECTS 122 CRORES WORLDWIDE IN 6 DAYS
JAB TAK HAI JAAN opened worldwide on Diwali, 13th Nov 2012, to a tremendous response at the box office and has set several collection landmarks ever since.
ALL INDIA NETT BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday 15.23 Cr Wednesday 19.54 Cr Thursday 14.45 Cr Friday 11.17 Cr Saturday 10.38 Cr Sunday 9.96 Cr TOTAL INDIA 80.73 Cr
It is the highest first day collection ever for any film released on Laxmi Pooja day, even though it did not have a solo release.
It is also Shahrukh Khan's highest opening day figure, ahead of both RA.One and DON2, which had solo releases.
OVERSEAS
JAB TAK HAI JAAN takes the International Box Office by storm.
JTHJ recorded some mind boggling figures for the opening day (Tuesday) screenings on a limited overseas release, as the film opened in stages over 14th, 15th, and 16th November.
The film has had a tremendous response and the audience reactions have been extremely positive. What has been most touching is that everyone is sitting through the end credits as the film pays a tribute to Yash Chopra, which makes it even more special.
OVERSEAS GROSS BOX OFFICE COLLECTION
Tuesday $1.30 Million Wednesday $1.20 Million Thursday $1.08 Million Friday $1.35 Million Saturday $1.52 Million Sunday $1.13 Million TOTAL $ 7.58 Million TOTAL OVERSEAS 41.7 crores
This is the highest grossing weekend for any Bollywood film overseas! <" http://www.yashrajfilms.com/News/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=1d3cf0a4-a473-4513-ae21-2864f6464dd5"> Bharatpandey2007 ( talk) 08:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Source - http://www.indiaglitz.com/channels/hindi/article/88404.html US - Opened at No. 5 on the US Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever
UK - Opened at No. 4 on the UK Box Office charts and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever .
Middle East - No. 1 at the Box Office and the highest midweek and weekend grossing Bollywood Film ever. The fastest ever in the Middle East for an Indian Film to reach the 2 Million Figure - in 5 days.
Australia - Opened at No. 2 on the Australia Box Office charts (limited release) and the highest opening Bollywood Film ever.
New Zealand - First Bollywood Film to open at No. 1, overtaking all Hollywood Films on Wednesday.
Germany - Opened at No. 7 on the German BO.
Pakistan - All time record of highest Opening Day collections for Film ever.
Singapore - All time record of highest Opening Bollywood Film ever.
Please add this data to the article.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The critics reviews have been mostly positive, not positive to mixed. Simbola16 ( talk) 10:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
total worldwide collections: 179.80 cr nett See link to verify request: http://boxofficecapsule.com/boxoffice-collections.aspx 199.64.0.253 ( talk) 00:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Jthj Domestic box office - 116.5 crore Jthj overseas box office - 63.5 crore Jthj worldwide box office - 180 crore
By Analyst Taran Adarsh Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 ( talk) 09:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
URL http://buzzcinemas.com/2012/11/29/jab-tak-hai-jaan-17th-day-worldwide-box-office-collection-reports/.html Written by Suresh Hussain — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.96.75 ( talk) 09:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
100 crore in 17 days is fake n I checked in box office India is written something else. This link will show u the exact box office collection from day1 to day 17 here is the link http://m.oneindia.in/entertainment/bollywood/box-office/2012/jab-tak-hai-jaan-2nd-week-17-days-collection-box-office-101582.html This is just the domestic nett This is site is the same as box office India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.101.118 ( talk) 05:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The film is "hit" not "superhit" according to BoxOfficeIndia.com: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=earnings
So in the third paragraph it should be " Box Office India declared the film a "hit" in India"
139.190.140.12 ( talk) 05:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Done ----
Plea$ant 1623
✉
14:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
The film has done excellent bussiness in overseas as it is usual for SRK and with a budget of around 50 cr ,finally it reached a figure of 100 cr in domestic market in struggling way.I am just wondering how can YRF and other trade analyst called it a worldwide blockbuster.I do not remove it from article myself because i do not want edit warring.Is yash raj website considered reliable?Please discuss about this issue. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Jineshparekh ( talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)I have a pretty straight opinion. Nett collection of a film reported only by the respective distribution studio should be considered because it the most correct. The reason is simple. The figures reported by the respective distribution studio are subject to statutory audits. The distribution studio reports the nett collection, which is the share it gets from ticket collections at box office, but after deduction of entertainment tax, to media. Hence, any over-reporting results in higher payment of entertainment tax and higher tax deduction at source (TDS). The concurrent statutory auditor of the studio is supposed to publish such over-reporting in his/her audit observation if the corresponding tax liabilities are not adhered to and paid by the distribution studio.
Besides, What is the credibility of Box Office India to question the collection reported by the distributor. Are they even aware of the subsequent tax implication on such over-reporting as they always claim about any film? BOI, except for publishing the collection on its own website, has no credibility whatsoever. For the collection report of BOI to be even considered for debate, one needs to be aware of the mechanism being adopted by BOI to find out collections from theater across India. The collection figures reported by BOI are not subject to any statutory audit. Hence, they can report what they wish to unlike the distribution studio.
in case of Jab Tak Hai Jaan, the film has collected Rs. 1.21 billion at the end of three weeks run, as reported by Yash Raj Films Limited. This is the most correct reporting. The film is a world wide block buster as declared by the offical distribution studio.
Previous figures given by boxofficeindia are estimates and around figure while latter it gave exact territorial breakdown which was exact one.It is an obvious thing and boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all.And at last you Ashermadan cowardly poisoned others users ears against me.Is that correct as it is not an arena,Do it in civil manner.Why dont you dare to discuss with me or other experienced users. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The conflicting reports must stay. Just the reason that(and i quote zeeyanketu) "boxofficeindia give figures in more precise manner than any other website that's why it is most reliable among all" is too illogical and naive to be taken seriously. BOI is a privately owned website, with no official stature. So, in case conflicting reports appear, they must be mentioned. I agree with ashermadan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An0nim0sity ( talk • contribs) 19:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Following a discussion few years back a consensus was made to use boxofficeindia as a reliable source for boxoffice figures of Bollywood films at wikipedia and we found it in every good article.As far as i have seen it is the only website which give results in algorithmic way although estimated figures are given earlier and exact figures updated latter on.It took time but never failed as usual for any good website and it is obvious that 10 different websites give different figures and then only break the stability of article.What is the need to add conflicting reports as there no need for it as i think.So,I want views of only experience users here so there will be no edit warring regarding this.Thankx ---zeeyanketu talk to me 19:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
While everyone here agrees to keep Box Office India for the Bollywood box office, users like AsherMadan has a history of pushing his agenda on SRK films. Wants to make everything fanboyish. Something like "It will collect more if Yash Raj Films decide to release it in other markets" is barely encyclopedic. Has a long history as we all know. Repeat, the consensus is to keep Box Office India time and again. -- 139.190.140.12 ( talk) 22:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
How can you easily said anyone vandal,troll and sockpuppet.That means you dont even know the exact meaning of these.You have a terrible history of edit warring and you were blocked twice too.Only boxofficemojo has been used for Hollywood films as Boxofficeindia for Bollywood.It cannot be changed for you.Not a single experienced user might be agree with you.It will be removed by further discusson. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 03:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Note: I am not related to any of these discussions, nor do I operate any sockpuppets. Do not connect my name with false accusations based on little to no evidence. --
GSK ●
✉
✓
19:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07
Son of sardaar nett grossed 105.03 crores. And Taran adarsh tweetsis a genuine sources.It has more than 2 lakhs followers on twitter,He takes data from production houses.,Even
Ajay Devgan tweeted on Guru purnima day,Nov28,2012 Evening 4 PM that
Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crores in india nett. you can check his tweet.some exceeptions can be made in wikipedia if
Box Office India is changing its figures 3-4 times. this doesn't happens ,but basically after
Golmaal 3it is changing drastically for these diwali releases. See these links:
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5133&nCat=
changed 75 cr to 69 cr for 10 days in india
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/youdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5139&nCat=
So please have conflicting reports in Son Of Sardaar also User talk:Abhinavname 05:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think the sentence below is very inaccurate:
However, Yash Raj Films and independent trade analysts called the film a "worldwide blockbuster."
It only uses one cite that goes to the producers of the film Yash Raj who claims so. It does NOT cite any other sources for "independent trade analysts" who called the film "worldwide blockbuster". And claims from producers isn't even third-party independent data as we all know. It should be changed to:
However, the production company Yash Raj Films claimed that the film was a "worldwide blockbuster."
139.190.140.12 ( talk) 22:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
y not go by boxofficeindia.co.in figure?they r also a ccredible site,boxoffice india changed the collection 3 times ,and their data differs from all the other data given by other sites and trade analysits who more or less agree on their data — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.139.144 ( talk) 04:59, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
What about Son of Sardaar and singham.???? Both are in 100-crore club by many sites and reliable sources.conflicting reports should be here also. See hese links: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07 http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/917/date/2012-11-30 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-11-30/box-office/35484121_1_crore-mark-ajay-devgn-ffilms-ashwni-dhir http://www.koimoi.com/box-office/son-of-sardaar-beats-bol-bachchan-grabs-7th-position-in-koimoi-top-10-india-box-office-2012/ http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?Section=Movies&ID=299099&subcatg=&keyword=bollywood&nid=299099 http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/movies/son-of-sardar-crosses-rs-100-crore-mark-in-india_123621.htm http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/son-of-sardaar-enters-100-crore-club/1/235423.html
Many sources such Taran Adarsh ,Times of India,Bollywood Hungama, Zee news,NDTV,Koimoi, etc. have stated that Son of Sardaar crossed 100 crore (US$18.2 million) nett.gross in India in 16 days.But Box Office India has stated only 88 cr(original 105 cr) for Son of Sardaar and 102 crore(origibal 120 cr) for Jab Tak Hai Jaan,after 3 weeks run in India.See this link: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat= Also BOI downgraded the verdict on JTHJ in india from "superhit" to hit" see this link: http://boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5136&nCat= and then it removed this page content. No trade magazine or website except Box Office India is giving wrong estimates early on,and deleting that page content. Please add conflicitng reports section on Son of sardaar and singham.Even for Barfi ,BOI has given only 106 cr(original its 120 cr )
I rember this Eid Day,on August 20,2012, Just n the evening when Taran Adarsh tweeted 100 cr nett. for Ek tha Tiger in 5 days,all New channels like Aaj Tak,Zee News,CNN-IBN and trade magazines statrted giving news of 100 cr for ETT from 4 pm in evening,while BOI has stated it crossed in 6 days. The difference in BOI and other sources(all these give same figures) is now growing from 5 cr to 13 cr and now its 18 cr fro JTHJ and SOS. Abhinavname ( talk) 06:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
even ibtimes.com saying domestic collection 120 crore http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/413753/20121211/jab-tak-hai-jaan-box-office-collection.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.128.11 ( talk) 08:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I suggest to move almost all of the 8. Box Office section to a new distinct Wikipedia page entitled:
Jab Tak Hai Jaan (box office),
(just as is done with section 7. Soundtrack : Main article:
Jab Tak Hai Jaan (soundtrack)).
That new JTHJ box office page would get Full protection, to stop edit warring between users, but those users, mainly interested in the film gross, could still continue the discussion about box-office figures on the "Talk" page of that new dedicated page.
Doing so would allow unprotecting the Jab Tak Hai Jaan page, so that users could resume contributing to the content, which is all Wikipedia is about. Bernarddb ( talk) 13:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Meanwhile, the Article page itself is half-dead, as people can no longer contribute. All that for a "small section" that should be of a few lines only... Bernarddb ( talk) 13:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
the film crossed 100 crores in just six days.please make a note of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.55.174 ( talk) 09:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
According to BOI, the film has now earned 102 crores:
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=5178&nCat=
So please change the sentence to:
While Box Office India stated that the film made around INR102 crore
139.190.171.30 ( talk) 16:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
See this link: JTHJ nett grossed ₹ 120 crore+ in india http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/trade/top5/id/919/date/2012-12-07 A gap of 18 crore And y only concentrating on JTHJ,even Son of Sardaar ,Barfi and ETT domestic nett gross in india is given 13-16 cr less by Box Office India.Exceptions can be made by including Bollywood Hungama and Koimoi figures. It will look weird to movie buff and people who are loving Bollywood films trade nad their collections,that when they browse these films article on Wikipedia,it willl show data in india less than 15 cr.When all 6-7 sources like Times of India,aaj Tak,Zee News, NDTV,Bollywood Hungama,Koimoi,Taran Adarsh,Komal Nahta etc. are giving same exact figures and BOI is giving different(first its giving wrong estimate,and then sometimes, deleting that page content when u want to see that page) BOI has downgraded verdict on Jab Tak Hai Jaan in india from Superhit to hit .Can u believe,Why it is giving wrong estimates then early on. Taran Adarsh take nett gross figures from production houses, but BOI takes from exibitors,distributors and multiplexes.that y when calculating worldwide gross figures, Box Office India can give entertainment tax. But stilll in worldwide gross also,BOI doesnot include tamil and telugu version gross.
Abhinavname ( talk) 15:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
The early figures are only estimates and near around.Updating exact figures take time dear.If it didnot update figures of other version(telugu,tamil etc) then you are welcome to add them from any reliable sources at the end of section's. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
boi has changed their data for jthj 3 times..its reports r varrying from other reliable sites and trade analysts by a huge margin who r more or less consistent among thmeselves,boxofficeindia.co.in also gives 120 cr as 3 week collection of jthj so boi is not trustworthy anymore and majority report should be mentioned in main article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.222.67 ( talk) 07:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
nope boxofficeindia.co.in gives day by day territrorial breakdown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.227.80.20 ( talk) 04:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template.
Sandstein
16:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Alright, this issue is plaguing a number of different articles, and keeps coming up all of the time. First of all, 139.190.171.30 (or anyone else), please point me to the specific discussion in which it was determined that Boxoffice India is not a reliable source. Looking at the site, the Wikipedia article about the site, and other info, they appear to meet wP:RS, but if previous discussions established that they are not (ideally, discussions at a central location, like WP:RS or WT:INB), then I will understand.
Second, could somebody please explain to me why the hell this matters? WP:NOTNEWS says that we are not a newspaper. We do not need to have week-by-week updates of the amount of money made by the film. In fact, I could make a strong argument that we shouldn't include any box office numbers until the film is out of the theaters, except if a secondary source like a newspaper or TV news program actually commented on it. It is not within our mission to be looking for instant updates from these box office tracking sites on a day-by-day basis. No harm whatsoever is done if Wikipedia's numbers are inaccurate for a few days. And now that I look at the article, I'd like a justification for the entire Box office section. As a general rule, Wikipedia does not report on "Week one, they made this, Week 2, they made this." etc. We should have particularly noteworthy info (i.e., that which is discussed in significant news stories), and a final total. So, it seems like there's a really easy way to solve this controversy: cut out almost the entire section. Qwyrxian ( talk) 23:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Please add the accolades section List of accolades received by Jab Tak Hai Jaan into the article after box office. Add = = Accolades = = and link this page to the main article. The award season has started and Jab Tak Hai Jaan has won some awards. -Ashermadan
Recently zeeyanketu put a WP:PROD on List of accolades received by Jab Tak Hai Jaan. However, since zeeyanketu was recommending that information be added to this article, the correct procedure is to request a merger, not a deletion. As such, I have declined that deletion request and am starting up the merger discussion. Here is a copy of zeeyanketu's prod rationale:
Article is not too long and references are copy pasted directly from main article.Its is better in main article because it has reasonable space only.Information is given about film in lead section but not regarding awards and award and nominations list has only single accolades.It is unusual a new article for single or two,three awards.
Please note that I personally am expressing no opinion on the matter; I'm merely fixing the procedural deficiency. Other editors should comment below about whether or not they think the content should be merged or remain as a separate article. Qwyrxian ( talk) 22:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Let keep it simple,merge it after three days unless it will be expanded to some extant where it will looked satisfactory. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 11:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
One small note: merger discussions are never closed for at least a week, and many run for up to a month. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
jab tak hai jaan grossed 100 crores worldwide in just six days.please make a note of it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.55.174 ( talk) 09:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
May I know now what is the consensus? Forgot to put name ( talk) 05:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I can't edit this page but the sentence "Sukanya Verma of Rediff described the film as an "an elegant, harmless entertainer for most part" and praised the visuals, acting and music." should not have two "an". Thanks Exadrid ( talk) 04:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)