From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Tone

The article reads like some p.r. flack's idea of a biographical article, not a serious encyclopedia article. For one thing, it's loaded with " peacock" terms. For another, it's full of unsourced opinion. Studerby ( talk) 23:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply

  • I've removed all that stuff. Much of the quotes are unlikely to be sourceable, and others don't serve any encyclopedic purpose. I've also cleaned up the tome. None of this material should be added back unless properly sourced. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Outdated

I tagged this article for updating, particularly because it says that he is currently working on a second album, and I presume he finished that work by now. PK T(alk) 15:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Tone

The article reads like some p.r. flack's idea of a biographical article, not a serious encyclopedia article. For one thing, it's loaded with " peacock" terms. For another, it's full of unsourced opinion. Studerby ( talk) 23:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC) reply

  • I've removed all that stuff. Much of the quotes are unlikely to be sourceable, and others don't serve any encyclopedic purpose. I've also cleaned up the tome. None of this material should be added back unless properly sourced. -- Whpq ( talk) 16:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Outdated

I tagged this article for updating, particularly because it says that he is currently working on a second album, and I presume he finished that work by now. PK T(alk) 15:08, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook