It doesn't make sense, structurally, to talk about construction, then the design, then the narrative of the boat's career. It's to combine the narrative elements and leave the technical stuff by itself.
Done
Watch ENGVAR - templates are putting out British spellings but American spellings are used elsewhere.
Based on previous discussions at
WP:RS/N (thinking specifically of the evaluation of Navweaps here), that doesn't make the site reliable - they would tell you to cite those sources directly.
Parsecboy (
talk)
12:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Iazyges: - one last thing I didn't notice before - the intro doesn't mention the fact that she's preserved as a museum ship - could you add a line to that effect? I think that's the last thing I'd like to see.
Parsecboy (
talk)
11:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply
It doesn't make sense, structurally, to talk about construction, then the design, then the narrative of the boat's career. It's to combine the narrative elements and leave the technical stuff by itself.
Done
Watch ENGVAR - templates are putting out British spellings but American spellings are used elsewhere.
Based on previous discussions at
WP:RS/N (thinking specifically of the evaluation of Navweaps here), that doesn't make the site reliable - they would tell you to cite those sources directly.
Parsecboy (
talk)
12:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Iazyges: - one last thing I didn't notice before - the intro doesn't mention the fact that she's preserved as a museum ship - could you add a line to that effect? I think that's the last thing I'd like to see.
Parsecboy (
talk)
11:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)reply