From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relevance

Ben Gurion St. is relevant to the context here because of the pro/anti-israeli feelings in europe that prompted this foundation, hence the caveat that most members are from france Lihaas ( talk) 10:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Has a reliable source made a connection between the incidents related to Ben Gurion St. and JCall? If not, including it in the article is impermissible synthesis. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 21:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply
1. that's the call for sources (the point of the fact tag)
2. it's in the "background" section to give context. WP:Bold and WP:Ignore call for editors to be bold w/o fear of political repercussions. Of course that doesnt mean i think its permanent, if nothing is forthcoming in due course (after a perion of some time with the call) then it must be removed. Lihaas ( talk) 23:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This has nothing to do with "political repercussions"; it has to with WP:SYNTH, part of WP:NOR. It doesn't matter that the incident happened, what matters is whether a RS has connected the incident with JCall. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
as per the citation needed tag, if nothing is forthcoming youre right it must go, but give it some time. the page only just hit 1k views. Lihaas ( talk) 19:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

uncited material

i saw something that said "citation needed" and i wanted to delete this uncited stuff but the page is protected Tommy has a great username ( talk) 20:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relevance

Ben Gurion St. is relevant to the context here because of the pro/anti-israeli feelings in europe that prompted this foundation, hence the caveat that most members are from france Lihaas ( talk) 10:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Has a reliable source made a connection between the incidents related to Ben Gurion St. and JCall? If not, including it in the article is impermissible synthesis. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 21:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply
1. that's the call for sources (the point of the fact tag)
2. it's in the "background" section to give context. WP:Bold and WP:Ignore call for editors to be bold w/o fear of political repercussions. Of course that doesnt mean i think its permanent, if nothing is forthcoming in due course (after a perion of some time with the call) then it must be removed. Lihaas ( talk) 23:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply
This has nothing to do with "political repercussions"; it has to with WP:SYNTH, part of WP:NOR. It doesn't matter that the incident happened, what matters is whether a RS has connected the incident with JCall. —  Malik Shabazz  Talk/ Stalk 02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC) reply
as per the citation needed tag, if nothing is forthcoming youre right it must go, but give it some time. the page only just hit 1k views. Lihaas ( talk) 19:27, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

uncited material

i saw something that said "citation needed" and i wanted to delete this uncited stuff but the page is protected Tommy has a great username ( talk) 20:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook