JBL Paragon has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 6, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from JBL Paragon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ohc
¡digame!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. You've done great work, and I am quite happy to assist you in improving it. All the best, -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 13:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
JBL Paragon has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 6, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from JBL Paragon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 9 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Ohc
¡digame!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a.
Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. You've done great work, and I am quite happy to assist you in improving it. All the best, -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 13:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)