This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment: I moved this section from the article for now, as it contained some false information.
Thue | talk 23:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
1Processors featuring Intel's HD 4000 graphics are set in bold. Other processors feature HD 2500 graphics or no graphics core (Graphics Clock rate indicated by N/A).
[ CPU World: Rumoured Ivy Bridge processors]
Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPU Clock rate | Graphics Clock rate |
L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date (Y-M-D) |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
Performance | 4 (8) | Core i7 | 3770K | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 650 MHz | 1150 MHz | 8 MB | 77 W | Q2 2011 | $ |
LGA 1155 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0^ |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1600 |
3770 | 3.4 GHz | $ | ||||||||||||
Mainstream | 4 (4) | Core i5 | 3570K | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz | 6 MB | $ | |||||||
3570 | 3.4 GHz | Q3 2011 | $ | |||||||||||
3550 | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | Q2 2011 | $ | ||||||||||
3470 | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 1100 MHz | Q3 2011 | $ | |||||||||
3450 | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | Q2 2011 | $ | ||||||||||
3330 | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 1050 MHz | Q3 2011 | $ |
^ Requires a 75/77-series Motherboard
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Ivy Bridge (computer processor) →
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) –
This is the proper name for computer processor designs.
Jasper Deng
(talk)
05:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page not moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 16:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) → Ivy Bridge – Primary topic. 126,000 views this month plus 2500 from its old title. Ivy Bridge college is currently still in its university's article which has 3000 views this month. Marcus Qwertyus 22:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I suggest this page is removed into a section in the Sandy Bridge article, as Ivy Bridge is just a die shrink of Sandy Bridge, not a new architecture. This is how it is done on other Wikipedia articles about Intel architectures as well. 83.108.199.200 ( talk) 03:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
I am moving the list of Ivy Bridge processors back to the Ivy Bridge page where it belongs. The list of Nehalem CPUs is on the Nehalem(microarchitecture) page, the list of Westmere CPUs is on the Westmere(microarchitecture) page, and the list of Sandy Bridge CPUs is on the Sandy Bridge(microarchitecture) page. For some reason Arndbergmann decided to break this style and move the Ivy Bridge CPU list to the Sandy Bridge(microarchitecture) page. 67.190.6.143 ( talk) 13:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Could User Jasper Deng specify which info is out of date? As of what i know, other than details that are already stated here, only info regarding motherboards are revealed/leaked. 175.156.216.71 ( talk) 01:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
When you do a search for "Ivy Bidge", this article is listed followed by a redirect to Sandy Bridge (redirect from Intel Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture)). Think it should be better redirected to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.5.181.210 ( talk) 19:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
This should be included in the article; cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.233.11 ( talk) 20:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
No sources other than this appear to discuss Ivy Bridge-EX to that extent, and much appears to be speculation. Is this worth adding to the article?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This section suggests that Ivy Bridge's heat problems are due, at least in part, to the use of thermal paste instead of fluxless solder. The "three" references are, in fact, one reference, because the other two just reference the same article at overclockers.com. However, after a little searching, I found this article which claims the change to thermal paste was not at fault. I'd like to see some more information on this, but it seems they did their homework, unlike overclockers, which is mere speculation. Sure, mathematical formulas might be great idea to demonstrate the problem, but not if they don't accurately reflect the real world. Thoughts? -- Manguene ( talk) 06:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Intel recently changed their pricing to display to two parts: tray and box. This affects only desktop processors because mobile processors are all tray. Currently all prices follow tray but i would like to recommend box instead. After all a lot of people coming here to look at the price are those buying boxed processor(s). 175.156.219.155 ( talk) 10:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
On a related topic, it is very rare to find tray chips for sale. I would find a column differentiating tray (OEM) chips from retail boxed chips (which are readily available) useful. The current table is useful for comparisons between all possible chips, but confusing for amateur builders looking to compare only those chips which are intended for retail sale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.99.76 ( talk) 06:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm requesting a new logo pic, although the Core i7 pic is correct for this generation of chip, it does not represent the entire lineup so if anyone can find a good one and post it up it would be greatly appreciated. Matthew Smith ( talk) 03:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Just noticed it was moved over to the Sandy Bridge page. Not sure what the point is, given that Ivy has its own page in the first place.-- Azul120 ( talk) 17:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, there seems to have been an enormous amount of successive micro-edits from Arndbergmann and Matthew Anthony Smith in the past couple days (although from what I've seen Matthew Anthony Smith's edits mostly seems to be reverting vandalism and small bits of cleanup). It seriously worries me that Arndbergmann has cut the article from 28,814 bytes to 15,553 bytes over the course of 3 minutes without discussing any of the changes in this article's talk page beforehand (he did post on the talk page 17 minutes after he cut the article in half), especially when the changes he made have already been discussed and agreed against. I don't want to make the edit as I haven't contributed much to this particular talk page, but I strongly support the position that Arndbergmann's edit be reverted. Charwinger21 ( talk) 11:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
I see entry-level i3 and Pentium CPUs based on Ivy Bridge, but no Celerons. Does Intel have plans for Celeron CPUs based on the Ivy Bridge architecture? And when will they become available for purchase by end users? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.165.42.62 ( talk) 15:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm not entirely wiki code literate, so I thought I would bring this up. Azul120 ( talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
But I won't fix that, this table is a *&$§% -- 84.183.240.90 ( talk) 12:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Always wondered. -- Azul120 ( talk) 02:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I think we should add QPI speeds for Xeon processors for both SB and IB. I have two ideas: changing the existing bus category, or just adding an extra column for the bus speeds. -- Azul120 ( talk) 19:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Target Segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPU Clock rate | Graphics Clock rate |
L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
Socket | Interconnect | Interfaces | Memory | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Type | Speed |
The E7 line just made its appearance, and I'm wondering how we should sort the processors at this point: by going with separate groupings for 2P, 4P and 8P, or to do a combined DP/MP group, like in the Westmere page. The latter would carry the advantage of having all of each (E5/E7) together. -- Azul120 ( talk) 02:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I'd say we need to describe the differences between FCLGA 2011, LGA 2011-1, LGA 2011-3 and similar variations of the LGA 2011 socket, preferrably as part of the LGA 2011 article. Thoughts? — Dsimic ( talk | contribs) 04:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Have those ever been documented? -- Azul120 ( talk) 00:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I notice the Xeon E3 v3 Family processors are not included in this page. Is there an intention to add this information at any point? I believe these SKUs were released almost a year ago. Jchap1590 ( talk) 15:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Following this article: /info/en/?search=List_of_Intel_graphics_processing_units
The graphics model column is wrong. Pentium and Celerons always have "HD Graphics" and not "HD Graphics 2000" or 3000.
We can check this on Intel website, for example for the Pentium G860: https://ark.intel.com/es/products/53492/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G860-3M-Cache-3_00-GHz
There you can see, Graphics model: Intel® HD Graphics.
On the other hand, on the i3 2105: https://ark.intel.com/es/products/55448/Intel-Core-i3-2105-Processor-3M-Cache-3_10-GHz?q=2105
There you can see, Graphics model: Intel® HD Graphics 3000
So the table column should be fixed, it's misleading showing pentiums and celerons having way better graphics that they actually have....
So the entire table is wrong, and its wrong for every single architecture going back to Nehalem (not sure if more). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.102.1 ( talk) 22:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Haswell (CPU) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment: I moved this section from the article for now, as it contained some false information.
Thue | talk 23:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
1Processors featuring Intel's HD 4000 graphics are set in bold. Other processors feature HD 2500 graphics or no graphics core (Graphics Clock rate indicated by N/A).
[ CPU World: Rumoured Ivy Bridge processors]
Target segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPU Clock rate | Graphics Clock rate |
L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date (Y-M-D) |
Price (USD) |
Motherboard | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Socket | Interface | Memory | ||||||||
Performance | 4 (8) | Core i7 | 3770K | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | 650 MHz | 1150 MHz | 8 MB | 77 W | Q2 2011 | $ |
LGA 1155 |
DMI 2.0 PCIe 3.0^ |
Up to dual channel DDR3-1600 |
3770 | 3.4 GHz | $ | ||||||||||||
Mainstream | 4 (4) | Core i5 | 3570K | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz | 6 MB | $ | |||||||
3570 | 3.4 GHz | Q3 2011 | $ | |||||||||||
3550 | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | Q2 2011 | $ | ||||||||||
3470 | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 1100 MHz | Q3 2011 | $ | |||||||||
3450 | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz | Q2 2011 | $ | ||||||||||
3330 | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 1050 MHz | Q3 2011 | $ |
^ Requires a 75/77-series Motherboard
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Ivy Bridge (computer processor) →
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) –
This is the proper name for computer processor designs.
Jasper Deng
(talk)
05:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page not moved. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 16:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture) → Ivy Bridge – Primary topic. 126,000 views this month plus 2500 from its old title. Ivy Bridge college is currently still in its university's article which has 3000 views this month. Marcus Qwertyus 22:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I suggest this page is removed into a section in the Sandy Bridge article, as Ivy Bridge is just a die shrink of Sandy Bridge, not a new architecture. This is how it is done on other Wikipedia articles about Intel architectures as well. 83.108.199.200 ( talk) 03:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
I am moving the list of Ivy Bridge processors back to the Ivy Bridge page where it belongs. The list of Nehalem CPUs is on the Nehalem(microarchitecture) page, the list of Westmere CPUs is on the Westmere(microarchitecture) page, and the list of Sandy Bridge CPUs is on the Sandy Bridge(microarchitecture) page. For some reason Arndbergmann decided to break this style and move the Ivy Bridge CPU list to the Sandy Bridge(microarchitecture) page. 67.190.6.143 ( talk) 13:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Could User Jasper Deng specify which info is out of date? As of what i know, other than details that are already stated here, only info regarding motherboards are revealed/leaked. 175.156.216.71 ( talk) 01:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
When you do a search for "Ivy Bidge", this article is listed followed by a redirect to Sandy Bridge (redirect from Intel Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture)). Think it should be better redirected to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.5.181.210 ( talk) 19:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
This should be included in the article; cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.233.11 ( talk) 20:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
No sources other than this appear to discuss Ivy Bridge-EX to that extent, and much appears to be speculation. Is this worth adding to the article?-- Jasper Deng (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
This section suggests that Ivy Bridge's heat problems are due, at least in part, to the use of thermal paste instead of fluxless solder. The "three" references are, in fact, one reference, because the other two just reference the same article at overclockers.com. However, after a little searching, I found this article which claims the change to thermal paste was not at fault. I'd like to see some more information on this, but it seems they did their homework, unlike overclockers, which is mere speculation. Sure, mathematical formulas might be great idea to demonstrate the problem, but not if they don't accurately reflect the real world. Thoughts? -- Manguene ( talk) 06:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Intel recently changed their pricing to display to two parts: tray and box. This affects only desktop processors because mobile processors are all tray. Currently all prices follow tray but i would like to recommend box instead. After all a lot of people coming here to look at the price are those buying boxed processor(s). 175.156.219.155 ( talk) 10:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
On a related topic, it is very rare to find tray chips for sale. I would find a column differentiating tray (OEM) chips from retail boxed chips (which are readily available) useful. The current table is useful for comparisons between all possible chips, but confusing for amateur builders looking to compare only those chips which are intended for retail sale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.99.76 ( talk) 06:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm requesting a new logo pic, although the Core i7 pic is correct for this generation of chip, it does not represent the entire lineup so if anyone can find a good one and post it up it would be greatly appreciated. Matthew Smith ( talk) 03:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Just noticed it was moved over to the Sandy Bridge page. Not sure what the point is, given that Ivy has its own page in the first place.-- Azul120 ( talk) 17:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, there seems to have been an enormous amount of successive micro-edits from Arndbergmann and Matthew Anthony Smith in the past couple days (although from what I've seen Matthew Anthony Smith's edits mostly seems to be reverting vandalism and small bits of cleanup). It seriously worries me that Arndbergmann has cut the article from 28,814 bytes to 15,553 bytes over the course of 3 minutes without discussing any of the changes in this article's talk page beforehand (he did post on the talk page 17 minutes after he cut the article in half), especially when the changes he made have already been discussed and agreed against. I don't want to make the edit as I haven't contributed much to this particular talk page, but I strongly support the position that Arndbergmann's edit be reverted. Charwinger21 ( talk) 11:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
I see entry-level i3 and Pentium CPUs based on Ivy Bridge, but no Celerons. Does Intel have plans for Celeron CPUs based on the Ivy Bridge architecture? And when will they become available for purchase by end users? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.165.42.62 ( talk) 15:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm not entirely wiki code literate, so I thought I would bring this up. Azul120 ( talk) 00:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
But I won't fix that, this table is a *&$§% -- 84.183.240.90 ( talk) 12:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Always wondered. -- Azul120 ( talk) 02:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I think we should add QPI speeds for Xeon processors for both SB and IB. I have two ideas: changing the existing bus category, or just adding an extra column for the bus speeds. -- Azul120 ( talk) 19:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Target Segment |
Cores (Threads) |
Processor Branding & Model |
CPU Clock rate | Graphics Clock rate |
L3 Cache |
TDP | Release Date |
Price (USD) |
Socket | Interconnect | Interfaces | Memory | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Turbo | Normal | Turbo | Type | Speed |
The E7 line just made its appearance, and I'm wondering how we should sort the processors at this point: by going with separate groupings for 2P, 4P and 8P, or to do a combined DP/MP group, like in the Westmere page. The latter would carry the advantage of having all of each (E5/E7) together. -- Azul120 ( talk) 02:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I'd say we need to describe the differences between FCLGA 2011, LGA 2011-1, LGA 2011-3 and similar variations of the LGA 2011 socket, preferrably as part of the LGA 2011 article. Thoughts? — Dsimic ( talk | contribs) 04:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Have those ever been documented? -- Azul120 ( talk) 00:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
I notice the Xeon E3 v3 Family processors are not included in this page. Is there an intention to add this information at any point? I believe these SKUs were released almost a year ago. Jchap1590 ( talk) 15:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ivy Bridge (microarchitecture). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Following this article: /info/en/?search=List_of_Intel_graphics_processing_units
The graphics model column is wrong. Pentium and Celerons always have "HD Graphics" and not "HD Graphics 2000" or 3000.
We can check this on Intel website, for example for the Pentium G860: https://ark.intel.com/es/products/53492/Intel-Pentium-Processor-G860-3M-Cache-3_00-GHz
There you can see, Graphics model: Intel® HD Graphics.
On the other hand, on the i3 2105: https://ark.intel.com/es/products/55448/Intel-Core-i3-2105-Processor-3M-Cache-3_10-GHz?q=2105
There you can see, Graphics model: Intel® HD Graphics 3000
So the table column should be fixed, it's misleading showing pentiums and celerons having way better graphics that they actually have....
So the entire table is wrong, and its wrong for every single architecture going back to Nehalem (not sure if more). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.102.1 ( talk) 22:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Haswell (CPU) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 05:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)