GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 21:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
I've now completed a quick skim-read of the article, but I've not checked any references/citations or copyright, and on this basis it looks to be a strong GA candidate.
I'm now going to work my way through the article starting at the History section and at the end of the article I'll go back and look at the WP:Lead. At this stage I'll mostly be looking for and commenting on any "problems" that I consider need to be fixed. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 20:37, 25 October 2012
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'm pleased to be able to award this article GA status. With more work it might make WP:FAC, however I would suggest that consideration been given to a WP:PR first. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk · contribs) 21:30, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
I've now completed a quick skim-read of the article, but I've not checked any references/citations or copyright, and on this basis it looks to be a strong GA candidate.
I'm now going to work my way through the article starting at the History section and at the end of the article I'll go back and look at the WP:Lead. At this stage I'll mostly be looking for and commenting on any "problems" that I consider need to be fixed. Pyrotec ( talk) 19:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Pyrotec ( talk) 20:37, 25 October 2012
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I'm pleased to be able to award this article GA status. With more work it might make WP:FAC, however I would suggest that consideration been given to a WP:PR first. Pyrotec ( talk) 20:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)