From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Itō isometry)

-Not consequent, in some wiki-articles the BM is denoted Brownian Motion with B or X and in this one (linked from such an article) we have Wiener process W. Not saying one is better than the other but decide on one

-"...of variances for RANDOM VARIABLES" would be more appropriate, since T is fixed. W being a F-Brownian should be enough, no need for F to be the natural filtration.

the explanation "why is it an isometry"

The norm on L^2(W) should be define as the integral on [0;T] of the expectation, because here the isometry presented is trivial, and doesn't use the isometry formula... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.193.0.25 ( talk) 17:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I've fixed it. Hairer ( talk) 14:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Missing Citation

In the book of Oksendal it is not mentioned that : for . 138.246.2.189 ( talk) 12:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)kw reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Itō isometry)

-Not consequent, in some wiki-articles the BM is denoted Brownian Motion with B or X and in this one (linked from such an article) we have Wiener process W. Not saying one is better than the other but decide on one

-"...of variances for RANDOM VARIABLES" would be more appropriate, since T is fixed. W being a F-Brownian should be enough, no need for F to be the natural filtration.

the explanation "why is it an isometry"

The norm on L^2(W) should be define as the integral on [0;T] of the expectation, because here the isometry presented is trivial, and doesn't use the isometry formula... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.193.0.25 ( talk) 17:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I've fixed it. Hairer ( talk) 14:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Missing Citation

In the book of Oksendal it is not mentioned that : for . 138.246.2.189 ( talk) 12:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)kw reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook