Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 23:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall a Good Article, however the WP:Lead is rather "thin" and could do with some expansion. The main body of the article appears to be quite comprehensive.
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding the article GA-status, as it stands. The WP:Lead, however, would benefit from some attention. Pyrotec ( talk) 08:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 23:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Overall a Good Article, however the WP:Lead is rather "thin" and could do with some expansion. The main body of the article appears to be quite comprehensive.
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding the article GA-status, as it stands. The WP:Lead, however, would benefit from some attention. Pyrotec ( talk) 08:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)