Isosceles triangle has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we add the etymology of the word 'isosceles' here? Googling I found that it was "isos ‘equal’ + skelos ‘leg’". I think it aids understanding. Chockyegg ( talk) 15:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Page Punta Cruz Watchtower refers to a "perfect isosceles triangle". Does that mean anything? 112.198.82.241 ( talk) 03:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.179.44 ( talk) 08:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fearstreetsaga ( talk · contribs) 19:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The article was a good read. Here are my suggestions:
@
Fearstreetsaga: Ok, I think I've handled all the points you mentioned above. Anything else to do? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Why is there so much bold in the lead section? Didnt3a ( talk) 10:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I wanted to point out a feature of isosceles triangles but am not sure where it would fit.
If you draw a line perpendicular from any side of an isosceles triangle to the opposite corner, the triangle is subdivided into two similar right triangles. These two triangles are congruent if the perpendicular line is drawn from the iscosceles base. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 21:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
How could he publish something in 1899? This is a clear mistake, at least unclear information, since there is no reference. If this refers to "Curiosa Mathematica", then it has to be 1890. So I guess it is a typo. 46.114.146.99 ( talk) 08:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Isosceles triangle has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can we add the etymology of the word 'isosceles' here? Googling I found that it was "isos ‘equal’ + skelos ‘leg’". I think it aids understanding. Chockyegg ( talk) 15:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Page Punta Cruz Watchtower refers to a "perfect isosceles triangle". Does that mean anything? 112.198.82.241 ( talk) 03:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.235.179.44 ( talk) 08:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fearstreetsaga ( talk · contribs) 19:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The article was a good read. Here are my suggestions:
@
Fearstreetsaga: Ok, I think I've handled all the points you mentioned above. Anything else to do? —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Why is there so much bold in the lead section? Didnt3a ( talk) 10:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
I wanted to point out a feature of isosceles triangles but am not sure where it would fit.
If you draw a line perpendicular from any side of an isosceles triangle to the opposite corner, the triangle is subdivided into two similar right triangles. These two triangles are congruent if the perpendicular line is drawn from the iscosceles base. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 21:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
How could he publish something in 1899? This is a clear mistake, at least unclear information, since there is no reference. If this refers to "Curiosa Mathematica", then it has to be 1890. So I guess it is a typo. 46.114.146.99 ( talk) 08:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)