![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Ismay, Montana be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Montana may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This could apply to many small towns on Wikipedia, but with such a tiny population, the percentages seem unnecessary. I don't know if this should be changed, although I suspect probably not. I also would not know if telling the actual numbers would be more appropriate. Any thoughts?
I was in Kansas City when the Chiefs started a contest to find a city in Montana to change its name to Joe. All residents of the winning city (Ismay) were given the chance to fly to Kansas City and attend a Chiefs game. I only remember about 15 people showing up on the news. Does anyone remember any more details of this event? -- Kainaw (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
"Males had a median income of $0 versus $0 for females." Impossible. Correction needed! Emeraude ( talk) 12:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, several years ago, I spent a good amount of time on this article schooling another editor on the limits of sources and the critical role of logic in the determination of what should be included in our articles. I came back tonight expecting that past argument to have been rendered moot by the inclusion of (hopefully more accurate) information from the 2010 Census. But it turns out that, while new population figures have been entered (and I'm sorry to see that "Joe, MT" does not appear to be headed in a promising direction), the income figures are identical to those of four years ago. Now while I would imagine that User:Nyttend would not see that as anything to question, I tend to consider this to be so unlikely as to approach impossibility.
Would someone who knows about such things be able to explain this? Is it, perhaps, just a failure of the Census Bureau to release income information? HuskyHuskie ( talk) 07:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ismay, Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015-3.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Ismay, Montana be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Montana may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This could apply to many small towns on Wikipedia, but with such a tiny population, the percentages seem unnecessary. I don't know if this should be changed, although I suspect probably not. I also would not know if telling the actual numbers would be more appropriate. Any thoughts?
I was in Kansas City when the Chiefs started a contest to find a city in Montana to change its name to Joe. All residents of the winning city (Ismay) were given the chance to fly to Kansas City and attend a Chiefs game. I only remember about 15 people showing up on the news. Does anyone remember any more details of this event? -- Kainaw (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
"Males had a median income of $0 versus $0 for females." Impossible. Correction needed! Emeraude ( talk) 12:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, several years ago, I spent a good amount of time on this article schooling another editor on the limits of sources and the critical role of logic in the determination of what should be included in our articles. I came back tonight expecting that past argument to have been rendered moot by the inclusion of (hopefully more accurate) information from the 2010 Census. But it turns out that, while new population figures have been entered (and I'm sorry to see that "Joe, MT" does not appear to be headed in a promising direction), the income figures are identical to those of four years ago. Now while I would imagine that User:Nyttend would not see that as anything to question, I tend to consider this to be so unlikely as to approach impossibility.
Would someone who knows about such things be able to explain this? Is it, perhaps, just a failure of the Census Bureau to release income information? HuskyHuskie ( talk) 07:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ismay, Montana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015-3.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:02, 15 April 2017 (UTC)