![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a logo be
included in this article to
improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
unfortunately, all the text in this article is plagarized from [1]. I am going to rewrite it. Elizmr 18:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
So, I updated some links, clarified some language, and updated some news (they finished their building). But I have a question about the "Notable Members" section. Besides the Tsarnaevs, who did attend the place if only occasionally, it was listing four (accused) terrorists with just one cite to a newspaper (New York Post), and it was an op-ed piece rather than a news piece. And one of the accusations is very shaky (Badawi was simply mentioned in an investigation about others), two of them the ISB says are false, and the fourth involves someone who radicalized decades after he was connected to the place. (Not to mention, it doesn't include any people notable for positive things.) Well, I considered just deleting it, but a newspaper source can count as a source, so maybe it has a right to be there but just needed balance? So I added a news article from the Boston Globe about how the ISB disputed the op-ed piece. But all in all, the list is looking a bit large relative to the rest of the article. So my question is, are the four disputed people verifiable enough to include in the list? Or should we just delete the section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megercliff ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC) whoops, thanks for autosigning, SineBot! -- Megercliff ( talk) 03:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Megercliff ( talk) 06:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
References
My first concern was the "Notable members" as how in the world can I add someone not tainted by legal cases, etc to such a list without it tainting them? Then I discovered that a sealed list (made public before it was sealed) [2] of Unindicted co-conspirators is being used. Clearly a BLP violation. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Islamic Society of Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a logo be
included in this article to
improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
unfortunately, all the text in this article is plagarized from [1]. I am going to rewrite it. Elizmr 18:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
So, I updated some links, clarified some language, and updated some news (they finished their building). But I have a question about the "Notable Members" section. Besides the Tsarnaevs, who did attend the place if only occasionally, it was listing four (accused) terrorists with just one cite to a newspaper (New York Post), and it was an op-ed piece rather than a news piece. And one of the accusations is very shaky (Badawi was simply mentioned in an investigation about others), two of them the ISB says are false, and the fourth involves someone who radicalized decades after he was connected to the place. (Not to mention, it doesn't include any people notable for positive things.) Well, I considered just deleting it, but a newspaper source can count as a source, so maybe it has a right to be there but just needed balance? So I added a news article from the Boston Globe about how the ISB disputed the op-ed piece. But all in all, the list is looking a bit large relative to the rest of the article. So my question is, are the four disputed people verifiable enough to include in the list? Or should we just delete the section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megercliff ( talk • contribs) 03:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC) whoops, thanks for autosigning, SineBot! -- Megercliff ( talk) 03:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Megercliff ( talk) 06:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
References
My first concern was the "Notable members" as how in the world can I add someone not tainted by legal cases, etc to such a list without it tainting them? Then I discovered that a sealed list (made public before it was sealed) [2] of Unindicted co-conspirators is being used. Clearly a BLP violation. Doug Weller talk 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Islamic Society of Boston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)