![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The term Işıkçılık is used in the Turkish language for two separate currents of Islamic thought or interpretation: the school ( Illuminationism) that follows the theology of Ibn Rushd and Suhrawardi and a conservative Sunni current founded by Hüseyin Hilmi Işık. The term Işıkçılık as used for an Alevi current of theology and the relevant content of the article is completely an original research of the mentioned user. Behemoth ( talk) 06:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
How many followers of Ishikism are there? 108.202.211.226 ( talk) 04:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Should be correct title in my opinion. Since their followers associate themselves with FLAME in Turkish language ALEV, and call their path as the "Followers of Flame" instead of the "Followers of Ali" which is a sub-branch of the madh'hab of Athnā‘ashariyyah Shia Islam.
This term indicates their members are the "Followers of Ali" which is a sub-branch of the madh'hab of Athnā‘ashariyyah Shia Islam.
This term is being used for NON-MUSLIM ALEVI/ALAWIs as the "Followers of Flame" but NOT Ali.
According to the Erdoğan Çınar, [1] Mourning of Muharram is due NOT to The Twelve Imams, but The 12 Serviceman of the Temple of Muu.. Hence, Alevi/ 'Alawi refers to Luvians.
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 17:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
If anyone has the answers, maybe edit the page and put in the information, add anything else that is relevant to the religion that I have not asked as the page seems to lack some facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Future deeplevel ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
"Ishikism" is not a religion of its own. It's a pejorative term used to refer to a heterodox form of Alevi theology. Anybody who follows Ishikism still identifies as an Alevi. There's not enough material to warrant an article of its own. Also, much of this article seems to be negatively biased against its subject matter.
192.211.31.117 ( talk) 22:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The term Işıkçılık is used in the Turkish language for two separate currents of Islamic thought or interpretation: the school ( Illuminationism) that follows the theology of Ibn Rushd and Suhrawardi and a conservative Sunni current founded by Hüseyin Hilmi Işık. The term Işıkçılık as used for an Alevi current of theology and the relevant content of the article is completely an original research of the mentioned user. Behemoth ( talk) 06:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
How many followers of Ishikism are there? 108.202.211.226 ( talk) 04:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Should be correct title in my opinion. Since their followers associate themselves with FLAME in Turkish language ALEV, and call their path as the "Followers of Flame" instead of the "Followers of Ali" which is a sub-branch of the madh'hab of Athnā‘ashariyyah Shia Islam.
This term indicates their members are the "Followers of Ali" which is a sub-branch of the madh'hab of Athnā‘ashariyyah Shia Islam.
This term is being used for NON-MUSLIM ALEVI/ALAWIs as the "Followers of Flame" but NOT Ali.
According to the Erdoğan Çınar, [1] Mourning of Muharram is due NOT to The Twelve Imams, but The 12 Serviceman of the Temple of Muu.. Hence, Alevi/ 'Alawi refers to Luvians.
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 17:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
If anyone has the answers, maybe edit the page and put in the information, add anything else that is relevant to the religion that I have not asked as the page seems to lack some facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Future deeplevel ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
68.100.172.139 ( talk) 22:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
"Ishikism" is not a religion of its own. It's a pejorative term used to refer to a heterodox form of Alevi theology. Anybody who follows Ishikism still identifies as an Alevi. There's not enough material to warrant an article of its own. Also, much of this article seems to be negatively biased against its subject matter.
192.211.31.117 ( talk) 22:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)